get the only key in dictionary python ?

Description

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org › python-get-key-from-value-in-dictionary

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org › python-get-key-from-value-in-dictionary
Python | Get key from value in Dictionary – GeeksforGeeks
10 août 2022Method 1: Get the key by value using list comprehension A list comprehension consists of brackets containing the expression, which is executed for each element along with the for loop to iterate over each element in the Python list to get the key from a value in Dictionary. Python3 dic ={geeks: A,for:B,geeks:C}

https://datascienceparichay.com › article › python-get-dictionary-keys

https://datascienceparichay.com › article › python-get-dictionary-keys
Get Keys of a Python Dictionary – With Examples
You can use the Python dictionary keys () function to get all the keys in a Python dictionary. The following is the syntax: # get all the keys in a dictionary sample_dict.keys() It returns a dict_keys object containing the keys of the dictionary. This object is iterable, that is, you can use it to iterate through the keys in the dictionary.

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org › python-get-the-first-key-in-dictionary

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org › python-get-the-first-key-in-dictionary
Python | Get the first key in dictionary – GeeksforGeeks
3 août 2022res = next(iter(test_dict)) print(The first key of dictionary is : + str(res)) Method #3 : Using For Loop : This can be done using for loop. In this method run a for loop get first key and break the loop and print first key of the dictionary. Python3. student_name = { ‘sham’: 10, ‘nil’: 30, ‘veer’: 40, ‘ram’: 50}

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org › python-dictionary-keys-method

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org › python-dictionary-keys-method
Python Dictionary keys() method – GeeksforGeeks
10 août 2022Method 1: Accessing the key using the keys () function A simple example to show how the keys () function works in the dictionary. Python3 Dictionary1 = {‘A’: ‘Geeks’, ‘B’: ‘For’, ‘C’: ‘Geeks’} print(Dictionary1.keys ()) Output: dict_keys ( [‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’]) Method 2: Python access dictionary by key

https://stackoverflow.com › questions › 46042430 › best-way-to-get-a-single-key-from-a-dictionary

https://stackoverflow.com › questions › 46042430 › best-way-to-get-a-single-key-from-a-dictionary
python – Best way to get a single key from a dictionary? – Stack Overflow
Since the question assumes the dictionary has only one key-value pair, I’d like to add two more methods besides the accepted answer. Use dict.popitem()[0]. popitem() returns the only key-value pair in tuple: (key, value). If you do not want to mutate the original dictionary, make a copy first. Build a set and then pop: set(mydict).pop().

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org › python-accessing-key-value-in-dictionary

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org › python-accessing-key-value-in-dictionary
Python | Accessing Key-value in Dictionary – GeeksforGeeks
Most used method that can possibly get all the keys along with its value, in operator is widely used for this very purpose and highly recommended as offers a concise method to achieve this task. Output: Original dictionary is : {‘geeks’: 3, ‘for’: 2, ‘Geeks’: 1} Dict key-value are : geeks 3 for 2 Geeks 1 Method #2 : Using list comprehension

https://www.tutorialspoint.com › How-to-get-a-list-of-all-the-keys-from-a-Python-dictionary

https://www.tutorialspoint.com › How-to-get-a-list-of-all-the-keys-from-a-Python-dictionary
How to get a list of all the keys from a Python dictionary?
19 sept. 2022In this article, we will show you how to get a list of all the keys from a python dictionary using various methods. We can get the list of all the keys from a python dictionary using the following methods −. Using dict.keys() method. Using list() & dict.keys() function. Using List comprehension. Using the Unpacking operator(*)

https://stackoverflow.com › questions › 38218501 › python-get-top-n-keys-with-value-as-dictionary

https://stackoverflow.com › questions › 38218501 › python-get-top-n-keys-with-value-as-dictionary
Python: Get top n key’s with Value as dictionary
If you dont need the dictionary to always be ordered, you can just do this: print (dict (sorted (data.items (), key = lambda x:getitem (x [1], score), reverse = True) [:2])) Share Improve this answer edited Jul 6, 2016 at 8:07 answered Jul 6, 2016 at 7:55 RoadRunner 24.6k 6 34 72 Add a comment 0

https://stackoverflow.com › questions › 16125229 › last-key-in-python-dictionary

https://stackoverflow.com › questions › 16125229 › last-key-in-python-dictionary
Last Key in Python Dictionary – Stack Overflow
Since a dictionary is unordered*, it’s doesn’t make sense to get the last key of your dictionary. Perhaps you want to sort them before. It would look like that: sorted(dict.keys())[-1] Note: In Python 3, the code is. list(dict)[-1] *Update: This is no longer the case. Dictionary keys are officially ordered as of Python 3.7 (and unofficially in 3.6).

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org › python-get-dictionary-keys-as-a-list

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org › python-get-dictionary-keys-as-a-list
Python | Get dictionary keys as a list – GeeksforGeeks
25 juil. 2022Method 1: Get dictionary keys as a list using dict.keys () The dict.keys () method in Python Dictionary, returns a view object that displays a list of all the keys in the dictionary in order of insertion. Python3 Output: dict_keys ( [1, 2, 3]) Method 2: Get dictionary keys as a list using dict.keys ()



Dictionary (data structure) redirects here. Not to be confused with data dictionary.
Associative container redirects here. For the implementation of ordered associative arrays in the standard library of the C++ programming language, see associative containers.
Map (computer science) redirects here. For the higher-order function, see Map (higher-order function).
In computer science, an associative array, map, symbol table, or dictionary is an abstract data type that stores a collection of (key, value) pairs, such that each possible key appears at most once in the collection. In mathematical terms an associative array is a function with finite domain.[1] It supports ‘lookup’, ‘remove’, and ‘insert’ operations.
The dictionary problem is the classic problem of designing efficient data structures that implement associative arrays.[2] The two major solutions to the dictionary problem are hash tables and search trees.[3][4][5][6] In some cases it is also possible to solve the problem using directly addressed arrays, binary search trees, or other more specialized structures.
Many programming languages include associative arrays as primitive data types, and they are available in software libraries for many others. Content-addressable memory is a form of direct hardware-level support for associative arrays.
Associative arrays have many applications including such fundamental programming patterns as memoization and the decorator pattern.[7]
The name does not come from the associative property known in mathematics. Rather, it arises from the fact that we associate values with keys. It is not to be confused with associative processors.
Contents
1 Operations
1.1 Properties
2 Example
3 Implementation
3.1 Hash table implementations
3.2 Tree implementations
3.2.1 Self-balancing binary search trees
3.2.2 Other trees
3.3 Comparison
4 Ordered dictionary
5 Language support
6 Permanent storage
7 See also
8 References
9 External links
Operations[edit]
In an associative array, the association between a key and a value is often known as a mapping, and the same word mapping may also be used to refer to the process of creating a new association.
The operations that are usually defined for an associative array are:[3][4][8]
Insert or put: add a new
pair to the collection, mapping the key to its new value. Any existing mapping is overwritten. The arguments to this operation are the key and the value.
Remove or delete: remove a
pair from the collection, unmapping a given key from its value. The argument to this operation is the key.
Lookup, find, or get: find the value (if any) that is bound to a given key. The argument to this operation is the key, and the value is returned from the operation. If no value is found, some lookup functions raise an exception, while others return a default value (zero, null, specific value passed to the constructor, …).
In addition, associative arrays may also include other operations such as determining the number of mappings or constructing an iterator to loop over all the mappings. Usually, for such an operation, the order in which the mappings are returned may be implementation-defined.
A multimap generalizes an associative array by allowing multiple values to be associated with a single key.[9] A bidirectional map is a related abstract data type in which the mappings operate in both directions: each value must be associated with a unique key, and a second lookup operation takes a value as an argument and looks up the key associated with that value.
Properties[edit]
The operations of the associative array should satisfy various properties:[8]
lookup(k, insert(j, v, D)) = if k == j then v else lookup(k, D)
lookup(k, new()) = fail, where fail is an exception or default value
remove(k, insert(j, v, D)) = if k == j then remove(k, D) else insert(j, v, remove(k, D))
remove(k, new()) = new()
where k and j are keys, v is a value, D is an associative array, and new() creates a new, empty associative array.
Example[edit]
Suppose that the set of loans made by a library is represented in a data structure. Each book in a library may be checked out only by a single library patron at a time. However, a single patron may be able to check out multiple books. Therefore, the information about which books are checked out to which patrons may be represented by an associative array, in which the books are the keys and the patrons are the values. Using notation from Python or JSON, the data structure would be:
{
Pride and Prejudice: Alice,
Wuthering Heights: Alice,
Great Expectations: John
}
A lookup operation on the key Great Expectations would return John. If John returns his book, that would cause a deletion operation, and if Pat checks out a book, that would cause an insertion operation, leading to a different state:
{
Pride and Prejudice: Alice,
The Brothers Karamazov: Pat,
Wuthering Heights: Alice
}
Implementation[edit]
For dictionaries with very small numbers of mappings, it may make sense to implement the dictionary using an association list, a linked list of mappings. With this implementation, the time to perform the basic dictionary operations is linear in the total number of mappings; however, it is easy to implement and the constant factors in its running time are small.[3][10]
Another very simple implementation technique, usable when the keys are restricted to a narrow range, is direct addressing into an array: the value for a given key k is stored at the array cell A[k], or if there is no mapping for k then the cell stores a special sentinel value that indicates the absence of a mapping. As well as being simple, this technique is fast: each dictionary operation takes constant time. However, the space requirement for this structure is the size of the entire keyspace, making it impractical unless the keyspace is small.[5]
The two major approaches to implementing dictionaries are a hash table or a search tree.[3][4][5][6]
Hash table implementations[edit]
Main article: Hash table
This graph compares the average number of CPU cache misses required to look up elements in large hash tables (far exceeding size of the cache) with chaining and linear probing. Linear probing performs better due to better locality of reference, though as the table gets full, its performance degrades drastically.
The most frequently used general purpose implementation of an associative array is with a hash table: an array combined with a hash function that separates each key into a separate bucket of the array. The basic idea behind a hash table is that accessing an element of an array via its index is a simple, constant-time operation. Therefore, the average overhead of an operation for a hash table is only the computation of the key’s hash, combined with accessing the corresponding bucket within the array. As such, hash tables usually perform in O(1) time, and outperform alternatives in most situations.
Hash tables need to be able to handle collisions: when the hash function maps two different keys to the same bucket of the array. The two most widespread approaches to this problem are separate chaining and open addressing.[3][4][5][11] In separate chaining, the array does not store the value itself but stores a pointer to another container, usually an association list, that stores all of the values matching the hash. On the other hand, in open addressing, if a hash collision is found, then the table seeks an empty spot in an array to store the value in a deterministic manner, usually by looking at the next immediate position in the array.
Open addressing has a lower cache miss ratio than separate chaining when the table is mostly empty. However, as the table becomes filled with more elements, open addressing’s performance degrades exponentially. Additionally, separate chaining uses less memory in most cases, unless the entries are very small (less than four times the size of a pointer).
Tree implementations[edit]
Main article: Search tree
Self-balancing binary search trees[edit]
Another common approach is to implement an associative array with a self-balancing binary search tree, such as an AVL tree or a red–black tree.[12]
Compared to hash tables, these structures have both advantages and weaknesses. The worst-case performance of self-balancing binary search trees is significantly better than that of a hash table, with a time complexity in big O notation of O(log n). This is in contrast to hash tables, whose worst-case performance involves all elements sharing a single bucket, resulting in O(n) time complexity. In addition, and like all binary search trees, self-balancing binary search trees keep their elements in order. Thus, traversing its elements follows a least-to-greatest pattern, whereas traversing a hash table can result in elements being in seemingly random order. Because they are in-order, tree-based maps can also satisfy range queries (find all values between two bounds) where a hashmap can only find exact values. However, hash tables have a much better average-case time complexity than self-balancing binary search trees of O(1), and their worst-case performance is highly unlikely when a good hash function is used.
It is worth noting that a self-balancing binary search tree can be used to implement the buckets for a hash table that uses separate chaining. This allows for average-case constant lookup, but assures a worst-case performance of O(log n). However, this introduces extra complexity into the implementation, and may cause even worse performance for smaller hash tables, where the time spent inserting into and balancing the tree is greater than the time needed to perform a linear search on all of the elements of a linked list or similar data structure.[13][14]
Other trees[edit]
Associative arrays may also be stored in unbalanced binary search trees or in data structures specialized to a particular type of keys such as radix trees, tries, Judy arrays, or van Emde Boas trees, though the ability of these implementation methods within comparison to hash tables varies; for instance, Judy trees remain indicated to perform with a smaller quantity of efficiency than hash tables, while carefully selected hash tables generally perform with increased efficiency in comparison to adaptive radix trees, with potentially greater restrictions on the types of data that they can handle.[15] The advantages of these alternative structures come from their ability to handle operations beyond the basic ones of an associative array, such as finding the mapping whose key is the closest to a queried key, when the query is not itself present in the set of mappings.
Comparison[edit]
Underlying data structure Lookup or Removal Insertion Ordered
average worst case average worst case
Hash table O(1) O(n) O(1) O(n) No
Self-balancing binary search tree O(log n) O(log n) O(log n) O(log n) Yes
unbalanced binary search tree O(log n) O(n) O(log n) O(n) Yes
Sequential container of key–value pairs
(e.g. association list) O(n) O(n) O(1) O(1) No
Ordered dictionary[edit]
The basic definition of the dictionary does not mandate an order. To guarantee a fixed order of enumeration, ordered versions of the associative array are often used. There are two senses of an ordered dictionary:
The order of enumeration is always deterministic for a given set of keys by sorting. This is the case for tree-based implementations, one representative being the