do you consider scientific truth as objective and universal ?

Description

do you consider scientific truth as objective and universal ?

Here are some links that might be useful to you:

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-objectivity

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-objectivity
Scientific Objectivity – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Scientific objectivity is a property of various aspects of science. It expresses the idea that scientific claims, methods, results—and scientists themselves—are not, or should not be, influenced by particular perspectives, value judgments, community bias or personal interests, to name a few relevant factors. Objectivity is often considered …
Author and Citation Info
Author and Citation Info – Scientific Objectivity – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

https://www.yext.com/blog/2020/07/is-truth-subjective-or-objective-heres-what-science-has-to-say

https://www.yext.com/blog/2020/07/is-truth-subjective-or-objective-heres-what-science-has-to-say
Is Truth Subjective or Objective? Here’s What Science Has to Say
6 min. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, scientific truth is objective, confirmed by proof, and is — or at least, ideally should be — universally accepted. Subjective truth, on the other hand, is dependent upon opinion and perspective — that’s where things get tricky, particularly for brands who are attempting to …

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com / cross-check / what-thomas-kuhn-really-thought-about-scientific-truth

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com / cross-check / what-thomas-kuhn-really-thought-about-scientific-truth
What Thomas Kuhn Really Thought about Scientific Truth
It is the rigidity and discipline of science, Kuhn said, that makes it so effective at problem-solving. Moreover, science produces the greatest and most original bursts of creativity of any …

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-pragmatic

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-pragmatic
The Pragmatic Theory of Truth – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
1.1 Peirce’s Pragmatic Theory of Truth. The American philosopher, logician and scientist Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914) is generally recognized for first proposing a pragmatic theory of truth. Peirce’s pragmatic theory of truth is a byproduct of his pragmatic theory of meaning.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-science/Scientific-truth

https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-science/Scientific-truth
Philosophy of science – Scientific Truth, Methodology, Epistemology …
Scientific truth. The previous discussion concentrated on only one of the controversies that surround scientific realism, the debate about whether talk of unobservables should have the same status as talk of observables. Contemporary exchanges, however, are often directed at a broader issue: the possibility of judging whether any claim at all …

https://iep.utm.edu/objectiv

https://iep.utm.edu/objectiv
Objectivity | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The object is something that presumably exists independent of the subject’s perception of it. In other words, the object would be there, as it is, even if no subject perceived it. Hence, objectivity is typically associated with ideas such as reality, truth and reliability. The perceiving subject can either perceive accurately or seem to …

https://k12.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Philosophy/05:_Epistemology/5.03:_Truth_and_Scientific_Truth

https://k12.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Philosophy/05:_Epistemology/5.03:_Truth_and_Scientific_Truth
5.3: Truth and Scientific Truth – K12 LibreTexts
27 mars 2022Pragmatic Theory of Truth. This theory is the belief that a proposition is true when acting upon it yields satisfactory practical results. As formulated by William James, the pragmatic theory promises (in the long term) a convergence of human opinions upon a stable body of scientific propositions that have been shown in experience to be successful principles for human action.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy-of-science/article/abs/understanding-truth-and-epistemic-goals/C651F68196E097403FCA6D228BC70617

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy-of-science/article/abs/understanding-truth-and-epistemic-goals/C651F68196E097403FCA6D228BC70617
Understanding, Truth, and Epistemic Goals | Philosophy of Science …
Abstract. Several argue that truth cannot be science’s sole epistemic goal, for it would fail to do justice to several scientific practices that advance understanding. I challenge these arguments but only after making a small concession: science’s sole epistemic goal is not truth as such; rather, its goal is finding true answers to relevant …

https://www.quantamagazine.org/questioning-truth-reality-and-the-role-of-science-20180524

https://www.quantamagazine.org/questioning-truth-reality-and-the-role-of-science-20180524
Questioning Truth, Reality and the Role of Science
It’s an interesting time to be making a case for philosophy in science. On the one hand, some scientists working on ideas such as string theory or the multiverse — ideas that reach far beyond our current means to test them — are forced to make a philosophical defense of research that can’t rely on traditional hypothesis testing. On the other hand, some physicists, such as Richard …

https://philarchive.org/archive/SANTOO-10

https://philarchive.org/archive/SANTOO-10
The Objectivity of Science Howard Sankey University of Melbourne
‘objective truth’. Truth is objective in the sense that it does not depend on what we believe. Truth depends on the way the world is.1 A true belief is one that gets the world right. The truth about the world need not be how we believe or wish the world to be. Truth has nothing to do with what we believe. It has everything to do with
lesoutrali bot