Bonjour, ceci est un commentaire. Pour supprimer un commentaire, connectez-vous et affichez les commentaires de cet article. Vous pourrez alors…
S. Coleri, M. Ergen, and T. J. Koo, “Lifetime analysis of a sensor network with hybrid automata modelling,” Processings of ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (Atlanta, GA), pp. 98–104, 2002.
- Listed: 1 August 2026 4 h 53 min
Description
S. Coleri, M. Ergen, and T. J. Koo, “Lifetime analysis of a sensor network with hybrid automata modelling,” Processings of ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (Atlanta, GA), pp. 98–104, 2002.
**S. Coleri, M. Ergen, and T. J. Koo, “Lifetime analysis of a sensor network with hybrid automata modelling,” Processings of ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (Atlanta, GA), pp. 98–104, 2002.**
When you first read a citation like this, it may seem like a dry list of names and conference details. But this particular reference actually marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of wireless sensor networks (WSNs). In 2002, the research community was grappling with the challenge of extending the operational lifetime of battery‑powered sensor deployments—a problem that still drives innovation in today’s Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems. Coleri, Ergen, and Koo’s paper offered a novel analytical lens: **hybrid automata modeling**.
—
### Why “Lifetime Analysis” Matters
Every sensor node in a wireless network is a tiny, energy‑hungry device. Once deployed, it must gather, process, and transmit data while conserving its finite power supply. Understanding how long a network can function before the first node dies is critical for applications ranging from environmental monitoring to battlefield surveillance. Traditional empirical testing is costly and time‑consuming, which is where theoretical modeling steps in.
—
### Hybrid Automata: A Powerful Tool
Hybrid automata blend discrete event systems with continuous dynamics—think of them as mathematical “hybrid machines” that can switch between different modes while still respecting physical constraints like battery drain rates. This framework lets researchers capture the stochastic behavior of sensor nodes (e.g., random sleep/wake cycles) and the continuous consumption of energy in a single unified model.
In the 2002 ACM workshop paper, the authors constructed hybrid automata that represented each sensor’s state (active, sleeping, transmitting, or dead) and the transitions between them. By solving the resulting equations, they derived closed‑form expressions for network lifetime that incorporated parameters such as packet size, transmission interval, and energy harvesting capabilities.
—
### Key Contributions
1. **Analytical Framework**: The paper was among the first to apply hybrid automata to WSN lifetime estimation, providing a reproducible method that could be adapted to newer protocols and hardware.
2. **Parameter Sensitivity**: It revealed how small changes in duty cycles or packet sizes could disproportionately affect overall longevity, guiding designers toward more energy‑efficient strategies.
3. **Scalable Modeling**: By modularly defining node behavior, the approach scaled from single‑node analysis to multi‑hop network scenarios, a precursor to later work on cluster‑based lifetime optimization.
—
### Legacy and Relevance Today
While the original conference was nearly two decades ago, the concepts introduced by Coleri and colleagues remain highly relevant. Modern sensor nodes now integrate energy harvesting, machine‑learning inference, and adaptive routing—all of which can be modeled within the hybrid automata framework. Moreover, the paper’s emphasis on analytical over empirical methods paved the way for simulation tools that estimate battery life under diverse environmental conditions.
If you’re designing a new WSN or simply fascinated by the mathematics that keep our smart environments humming, understanding the hybrid automata approach is indispensable. The 2002 ACM workshop paper isn’t just a citation—it’s a foundational building block for anyone looking to engineer resilient, long‑lasting sensor deployments.
—
### Keywords for the Curious Reader
– Wireless sensor networks
– Sensor network lifetime
– Hybrid automata modeling
– Battery life estimation
– Energy-aware networking
– ACM Workshop 2002
– Processings of ACM International Workshop
By revisiting this seminal work, we not only honor the pioneers who first quantified “lifetime” in a rigorous way but also equip ourselves with the analytical tools to push the boundaries of tomorrow’s connected world.
16 total views, 2 today
Sponsored Links
A. Francos, G. Bidoglio, L. Galbiati, F. Bouraoui, F. J. Elorza, S. Rekolai...
A. Francos, G. Bidoglio, L. Galbiati, F. Bouraoui, F. J. Elorza, S. Rekolainen, K. Manni, and K. Granlund, “Hy-drological and water quality modelling in medium […]
No views yet
N. Fohrer, D. Moller, and N. Steiner, “An interdiscipli-nary modeling appro...
N. Fohrer, D. Moller, and N. Steiner, “An interdiscipli-nary modeling approach to evaluate the effects of land use change,” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, […]
1 total views, 1 today
K. Eckhartd and J. G. Arnold, “Automatic calibration of a distributed catch...
K. Eckhartd and J. G. Arnold, “Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 251, pp. 103–109, 2001. **K. Eckhartd and J. […]
No views yet
D. K. Borah and M. Bera, “SWAT model background and application reviews,” P...
D. K. Borah and M. Bera, “SWAT model background and application reviews,” Paper Number: 032054, Pre-sented at the ASAE Annual International Meeting, July 27-July 30, […]
No views yet
J. Benaman, C. A. Shoemaker, and D. A. Haith, “Model-ing non-point source p...
J. Benaman, C. A. Shoemaker, and D. A. Haith, “Model-ing non-point source pollution using a distributed water-shed model for the Cannonsville Reservoir Basin,” Dela-ware County, […]
1 total views, 1 today
J. G. Arnold, R. S. Srinivasan, and J. R. Williams, “Large area hydrologic ...
J. G. Arnold, R. S. Srinivasan, and J. R. Williams, “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part 1. Model development,” Journal of the American Water […]
No views yet
J. G. Arnold, and N. Fohrer, “SWAT2000: Current capa-bilities and research ...
J. G. Arnold, and N. Fohrer, “SWAT2000: Current capa-bilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling,” Hydrology Process, Vol. 19, pp. 563–572, 2005. Here’s a […]
No views yet
J. G. Arnold, P. M. Allen, and D. Morgan, “Hydrologic model for design of c...
J. G. Arnold, P. M. Allen, and D. Morgan, “Hydrologic model for design of constructed wetlands,” Wetlands, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 167–178, 2001. None
1 total views, 1 today
S. A. Muyibi, M. J. M. M. Noor, T. K. Leong, and L. H. Loon, “Effect of oil...
S. A. Muyibi, M. J. M. M. Noor, T. K. Leong, and L. H. Loon, “Effect of oil extraction from Moringa oleifera seeds on coagulation […]
1 total views, 1 today
S. A. A. Jahn, “Using Moringa oleifera seeds as coagu-lant in developing co...
S. A. A. Jahn, “Using Moringa oleifera seeds as coagu-lant in developing countries,” J. Am. Wat. Wks Ass., Vol. 6, pp. 43–50, 1988. **S. A. […]
1 total views, 1 today
A. Francos, G. Bidoglio, L. Galbiati, F. Bouraoui, F. J. Elorza, S. Rekolai...
A. Francos, G. Bidoglio, L. Galbiati, F. Bouraoui, F. J. Elorza, S. Rekolainen, K. Manni, and K. Granlund, “Hy-drological and water quality modelling in medium […]
No views yet
N. Fohrer, D. Moller, and N. Steiner, “An interdiscipli-nary modeling appro...
N. Fohrer, D. Moller, and N. Steiner, “An interdiscipli-nary modeling approach to evaluate the effects of land use change,” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, […]
1 total views, 1 today
K. Eckhartd and J. G. Arnold, “Automatic calibration of a distributed catch...
K. Eckhartd and J. G. Arnold, “Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model,” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 251, pp. 103–109, 2001. **K. Eckhartd and J. […]
No views yet
D. K. Borah and M. Bera, “SWAT model background and application reviews,” P...
D. K. Borah and M. Bera, “SWAT model background and application reviews,” Paper Number: 032054, Pre-sented at the ASAE Annual International Meeting, July 27-July 30, […]
No views yet
J. Benaman, C. A. Shoemaker, and D. A. Haith, “Model-ing non-point source p...
J. Benaman, C. A. Shoemaker, and D. A. Haith, “Model-ing non-point source pollution using a distributed water-shed model for the Cannonsville Reservoir Basin,” Dela-ware County, […]
1 total views, 1 today
J. G. Arnold, R. S. Srinivasan, and J. R. Williams, “Large area hydrologic ...
J. G. Arnold, R. S. Srinivasan, and J. R. Williams, “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part 1. Model development,” Journal of the American Water […]
No views yet
J. G. Arnold, and N. Fohrer, “SWAT2000: Current capa-bilities and research ...
J. G. Arnold, and N. Fohrer, “SWAT2000: Current capa-bilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling,” Hydrology Process, Vol. 19, pp. 563–572, 2005. Here’s a […]
No views yet
J. G. Arnold, P. M. Allen, and D. Morgan, “Hydrologic model for design of c...
J. G. Arnold, P. M. Allen, and D. Morgan, “Hydrologic model for design of constructed wetlands,” Wetlands, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 167–178, 2001. None
1 total views, 1 today
S. A. Muyibi, M. J. M. M. Noor, T. K. Leong, and L. H. Loon, “Effect of oil...
S. A. Muyibi, M. J. M. M. Noor, T. K. Leong, and L. H. Loon, “Effect of oil extraction from Moringa oleifera seeds on coagulation […]
1 total views, 1 today
S. A. A. Jahn, “Using Moringa oleifera seeds as coagu-lant in developing co...
S. A. A. Jahn, “Using Moringa oleifera seeds as coagu-lant in developing countries,” J. Am. Wat. Wks Ass., Vol. 6, pp. 43–50, 1988. **S. A. […]
1 total views, 1 today
Recent Comments