Bonjour, ceci est un commentaire. Pour supprimer un commentaire, connectez-vous et affichez les commentaires de cet article. Vous pourrez alors…
3GPP TR 25.913 V7.3.0 (2006-03), “Requirements for evolved UTRA (E-UTRA) and evolved UTRAN (E-UTRAN) (Release 7),” 3GPP TSG RAN, 2006.
- Listed: 5 August 2026 16 h 36 min
Description
3GPP TR 25.913 V7.3.0 (2006-03), “Requirements for evolved UTRA (E-UTRA) and evolved UTRAN (E-UTRAN) (Release 7),” 3GPP TSG RAN, 2006.
**3GPP TR 25.913 V7.3.0 (2006‑03), “Requirements for evolved UTRA (E‑UTRA) and evolved UTRAN (E‑UTRAN) (Release 7),” 3GPP TSG RAN, 2006**
—
The world of mobile communications moves at lightning speed, and every major leap is underpinned by a handful of technical documents that most users never see. One of those pivotal papers is **3GPP TR 25.913 V7.3.0**, released in March 2006. Though the title may sound like a string of acronyms, the report is the blueprint that helped turn 4G LTE from a concept into the high‑speed, low‑latency networks we rely on today. In this post we’ll unpack what the document covers, why it mattered for the evolution of UTRA to E‑UTRA and UTRAN to E‑UTRAN, and how its requirements still echo in today’s 5G rollout.
### What is 3GPP and why does it matter?
The **3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP)** is a global consortium of standards bodies—including ETSI, ARIB, ATIS, and others—that collaborates on the specifications for cellular technologies. From the early days of GSM (2G) to the cutting‑edge 5G NR (New Radio), 3GPP defines the radio interface, core network architecture, and service requirements that manufacturers and operators must follow. Because the consortium brings together industry leaders, its specifications become the de‑facto standards that drive worldwide interoperability.
### From UTRA to E‑UTRA: the radio‑access evolution
UTRA (Universal Terrestrial Radio Access) was the radio interface used in 3G UMTS networks. While it delivered a respectable data rate for its time, the explosion of mobile video, cloud services, and IoT devices soon exposed its limitations. **E‑UTRA (Evolved UTRA)**—the air‑interface introduced in Release 7—was designed to:
* **Boost peak data rates** to several hundred megabits per second (later refined to 1 Gbps in LTE‑Advanced).
* **Improve spectral efficiency**, allowing more users to share the same bandwidth.
* **Reduce latency**, a critical factor for real‑time gaming and VoIP.
These goals required a fresh set of radio‑access requirements, which TR 25.913 meticulously documented.
### E‑UTRAN: the next‑generation network architecture
While E‑UTRA defines how the handset talks to the tower, **E‑UTRAN (Evolved UTRAN)** describes the network side of that conversation. The report outlines a leaner, flatter architecture that replaces the traditional Node B and Radio Network Controller (RNC) hierarchy with a single **eNodeB** (enhanced base station). This simplification yields:
* **Faster handovers** between cells, essential for high‑speed mobility.
* **Scalable deployment**, enabling operators to add capacity without massive infrastructure overhauls.
* **Enhanced carrier aggregation**, allowing multiple frequency bands to be combined for higher throughput.
### Key requirements highlighted in TR 25.913
1. **Performance Targets** – Minimum downlink and uplink throughput, latency thresholds, and reliability metrics.
2. **Inter‑operability** – Compatibility with existing 3G UMTS equipment to ensure a smooth migration path.
3. **Power Efficiency** – Reduced device power consumption, extending battery life for smartphones and IoT sensors.
4. **Security** – Strengthened encryption and authentication mechanisms to protect user data.
5. **Scalability** – Ability to support massive device densities anticipated in future urban deployments.
These requirements formed the technical foundation for **LTE (Long Term Evolution)**, the commercial name for the technology that rolled out globally beginning in 2009.
### The lasting impact on today’s networks
Even though the document is over a decade old, its influence persists. The **E‑UTRA/E‑UTRAN** concepts introduced in Release 7 were refined in later releases (e.g., LTE‑Advanced, LTE‑Advanced Pro) and served as a stepping stone for **5G NR**. Many of the performance and efficiency goals—high data rates, low latency, and energy‑savvy operation—remain central to 5G specifications.
Operators still reference TR 25.913 when planning network upgrades, ensuring backward compatibility and a consistent quality of service across generations. Moreover, the report’s emphasis on **carrier aggregation**, **MIMO (Multiple‑Input Multiple‑Output)**, and **small‑cell deployment** continues to shape modern **mobile broadband** strategies.
### Why you should care
If you’re a telecom professional, a network planner, or simply a tech‑savvy consumer, understanding the origins of LTE helps you appreciate the engineering feats behind every video stream, video call, and cloud‑based app you use daily. The document illustrates how **standardization**, **collaboration**, and **clear performance requirements** turn visionary ideas into reliable, worldwide services.
### Bottom line
**3GPP TR 25.913 V7.3.0** may look like a dense technical report, but it is the cornerstone that enabled the transition from 3G UTRA to the high‑speed, low‑latency world of **E‑UTRA/E‑UTRAN**—the heart of 4G LTE. Its requirements not only guided the rollout of today’s mobile broadband but also laid the groundwork for the next wave of innovation in 5G and beyond.
—
**Keywords:** 3GPP, TR 25.913, E‑UTRA, E‑UTRAN, LTE, 4G LTE, mobile network evolution, cellular standards, radio access network, eNodeB, carrier aggregation, MIMO, 5G NR, telecom standards, mobile broadband, network architecture, spectral efficiency, low latency.
2 total views, 2 today
Sponsored Links
M. Schubert, S. Shi, E. A. Jorswieck, and H. Boche, “Downlink sum-MSE trans...
M. Schubert, S. Shi, E. A. Jorswieck, and H. Boche, “Downlink sum-MSE transceiver optimization for linear multi-user MIMO systems,” in Proceedings of 39th Asilomar Conference […]
No views yet
M. Lee and S. K. Oh, “A per-user successive MMSE precoding technique in mul...
M. Lee and S. K. Oh, “A per-user successive MMSE precoding technique in multiuser MIMO systems,” in Proceedings of IEEE VTC 2007-Spring, pp. 2374–2378, 22–25 […]
1 total views, 1 today
M. Joham, J. Brehmer, and W. Utschick, “MMSE approaches to multiuser spatio...
M. Joham, J. Brehmer, and W. Utschick, “MMSE approaches to multiuser spatio-temporal Tomlinson-Harashima precoding,” in Proceedings of 5th International ITG Conference on Source and Channel […]
No views yet
V. Stankovic and M. Haardt, “Successive optimization Tomlinson-Harashima pr...
V. Stankovic and M. Haardt, “Successive optimization Tomlinson-Harashima precoding (SO THP) for multi- user MIMO systems,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, […]
No views yet
V. Stankovic, M. Haardt, and G. D. Galdo, “Efficient multi-user MIMO downli...
V. Stankovic, M. Haardt, and G. D. Galdo, “Efficient multi-user MIMO downlink precoding and scheduling,” in Proceedings of 1st IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances […]
No views yet
M. Costa, “Writing on dirty paper,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory...
M. Costa, “Writing on dirty paper,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 29, pp. 439–441, May 1983. **M. Costa, “Writing on dirty paper,” IEEE Transactions on […]
No views yet
V. Stankovic and M. Haardt, “Multi-user MIMO down- link precoding for users...
V. Stankovic and M. Haardt, “Multi-user MIMO down- link precoding for users with multiple antennas,” in Proceedings of 12th Wireless World Research Forum (WWRF), Toronto, […]
No views yet
Q. H. Spencer, A. L. Swindlehurst, and M. Haardt, “Zero-forcing methods for...
Q. H. Spencer, A. L. Swindlehurst, and M. Haardt, “Zero-forcing methods for downlink spatial multiplexing in multiuser MIMO channels,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. […]
No views yet
B. Bandemer, M. Haardt, and S. Visuri, “Linear MMSE multi-user MIMO downlin...
B. Bandemer, M. Haardt, and S. Visuri, “Linear MMSE multi-user MIMO downlink precoding for users with multiple antennas,” in Proceedings of IEEE 17th International Symposium […]
1 total views, 1 today
Q. Spencer and M. Haardt, “Capacity and downlink transmission algorithms fo...
Q. Spencer and M. Haardt, “Capacity and downlink transmission algorithms for a multi-user MIMO channel,” in Proceedings of 36th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and […]
1 total views, 1 today
M. Schubert, S. Shi, E. A. Jorswieck, and H. Boche, “Downlink sum-MSE trans...
M. Schubert, S. Shi, E. A. Jorswieck, and H. Boche, “Downlink sum-MSE transceiver optimization for linear multi-user MIMO systems,” in Proceedings of 39th Asilomar Conference […]
No views yet
M. Lee and S. K. Oh, “A per-user successive MMSE precoding technique in mul...
M. Lee and S. K. Oh, “A per-user successive MMSE precoding technique in multiuser MIMO systems,” in Proceedings of IEEE VTC 2007-Spring, pp. 2374–2378, 22–25 […]
1 total views, 1 today
M. Joham, J. Brehmer, and W. Utschick, “MMSE approaches to multiuser spatio...
M. Joham, J. Brehmer, and W. Utschick, “MMSE approaches to multiuser spatio-temporal Tomlinson-Harashima precoding,” in Proceedings of 5th International ITG Conference on Source and Channel […]
No views yet
V. Stankovic and M. Haardt, “Successive optimization Tomlinson-Harashima pr...
V. Stankovic and M. Haardt, “Successive optimization Tomlinson-Harashima precoding (SO THP) for multi- user MIMO systems,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, […]
No views yet
V. Stankovic, M. Haardt, and G. D. Galdo, “Efficient multi-user MIMO downli...
V. Stankovic, M. Haardt, and G. D. Galdo, “Efficient multi-user MIMO downlink precoding and scheduling,” in Proceedings of 1st IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances […]
No views yet
M. Costa, “Writing on dirty paper,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory...
M. Costa, “Writing on dirty paper,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 29, pp. 439–441, May 1983. **M. Costa, “Writing on dirty paper,” IEEE Transactions on […]
No views yet
V. Stankovic and M. Haardt, “Multi-user MIMO down- link precoding for users...
V. Stankovic and M. Haardt, “Multi-user MIMO down- link precoding for users with multiple antennas,” in Proceedings of 12th Wireless World Research Forum (WWRF), Toronto, […]
No views yet
Q. H. Spencer, A. L. Swindlehurst, and M. Haardt, “Zero-forcing methods for...
Q. H. Spencer, A. L. Swindlehurst, and M. Haardt, “Zero-forcing methods for downlink spatial multiplexing in multiuser MIMO channels,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. […]
No views yet
B. Bandemer, M. Haardt, and S. Visuri, “Linear MMSE multi-user MIMO downlin...
B. Bandemer, M. Haardt, and S. Visuri, “Linear MMSE multi-user MIMO downlink precoding for users with multiple antennas,” in Proceedings of IEEE 17th International Symposium […]
1 total views, 1 today
Q. Spencer and M. Haardt, “Capacity and downlink transmission algorithms fo...
Q. Spencer and M. Haardt, “Capacity and downlink transmission algorithms for a multi-user MIMO channel,” in Proceedings of 36th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and […]
1 total views, 1 today
Recent Comments