Description

who said culture is the man made part of environment ?

**Title:** *”Culture: The Man-Made Part of Our Environment—Who Got It Right?”*

**Introduction**
The question of who coined the phrase *“Culture is the man-made part of the environment”* has sparked debate among students of anthropology and sociology. While the phrase itself elegantly captures culture’s anthropogenic nature, tracing its origin to the right scholar requires sorting through historical definitions and conflicting sources. Let’s unravel this puzzle and explore its significance.

—

### **The Contenders: Tylor vs. Herskovits**
The question often appears in quizzes, offering options like Edward B. Tylor, Melville J. Herskovits, and others. Yet sources are split on the correct answer.

**Edward B. Tylor (Option A):**
Tylor, the 19th-century “father of cultural anthropology,” famously defined culture as [Culture = “that complex whole including knowledge, belief, art, morals… acquired as a member of society.”] His work laid the foundation for modern definitions, emphasizing culture as a *social inheritance*. Many confuse his broader definition with the “man-made” quote.

**Melville J. Herskovits (Option B):**
According to sources like *[MCQmate](https://mcqmate.com)* and *[ExamVeda](https://www.examveda.com)*, the correct attribution is to Herskovits. His writings, particularly on cultural relativism and material culture, suggest he framed culture as a human-altered environment. For instance, he argued that culture shapes how societies adapt to their surroundings, hence culture itself becomes a “man-made layer” over natural environments.

**Why the Confusion?**
Sites like *[Brainly](https://brainly.in)* sometimes cite Tylor, likely conflating his classic definition with this specific “man-made” phrase. The confusion arises because both scholars tackled culture’s relationship to the environment, but through different lenses.

—

### **Culture as a Man-Made Environment: Explained**
What does the phrase mean, exactly?
– **Material vs. Non-Material Culture:** A “man-made part of the environment” refers to the collective creations—tools, art, language, laws—that humans superimpose on natural landscapes. A *Mangalsutra* (a traditional Indian necklace) versus a river; the former is human-made, yet integral to cultural identity.
– **Adaptation and Environmental Interaction:** Herskovits emphasized how societies mold their environments (e.g., irrigation systems, urban规划) to suit their needs, making culture a “product of and response to” surroundings (per his 1955 works).

—

### **Why It Matters in Anthropology**
This debate underscores **cultural relativism** and how societies define themselves. Tylor’s holistic view focused on cultural transmission, while Herskovits highlighted its creative, tangible aspects. Marxists.org adds that culture’s *objectivity* lies in its being *produced by collective human effort*, aligning with both interpretations.

—

### **Verdict: Credit Where It’s Due**
Based on credible sources (MCQmate, ExamVeda, Brainly’s conflicting takes), the consensus leans toward **M.J. Herskovits**. Tylor’s “complex whole” definition is legendary, but the specific “man-made” phrasing aligns more with Herskovits’ focus on culture as *human agency altering environments*.

—

**Closing Thoughts**
Whether Tylor or Herskovits made the quote, the essence remains: culture is humanity’s imprint on the world. From village customs to skyscrapers, it’s proof that we don’t just *live in* nature—we reshape it through shared ideas.

—

**Further Reading**
– Explore Herskovits’ *Cultural Relativity* for insights on culture-environment interplay.
– Revisit Tylor’s 1871 *Primitive Culture* to see the roots of cultural studies.

In conclusion, the “man-made part” quote may trace to Herskovits, but its interpretation continues to inspire debates about humanity’s role in shaping our world.

*Sources referenced include examveda.com, Quora discussions, and academic debates cited.*

*[End of Blog Post]*

—

**Key Notes for Engagement:**
– Pose questions to readers: *”What examples of ‘man-made environment’ do you see daily?”*
– Use visuals (tools, buildings) to illustrate material vs. non-material culture.
– Highlight practical implications: Urban planning, eco-conscious design, or cultural preservation efforts.

This approach balances rigor and readability, guiding readers through confusion to clarity while emphasizing anthropology’s evolving ideas.