Welcome, visitor! [ Login

 

T. Barrett and R. Edgar. (2006) Mining Microarray Data at NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Methods Mol Biol 338: 175-190.

  • Listed: 22 May 2026 23 h 27 min

Description

T. Barrett and R. Edgar. (2006) Mining Microarray Data at NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Methods Mol Biol 338: 175-190.

**”T. Barrett and R. Edgar. (2006) Mining Microarray Data at NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Methods Mol Biol 338: 175-190.”**

The field of microarray analysis has revolutionized the way researchers approach understanding gene expression and its role in various biological processes. One of the key resources facilitating this research is the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, maintained by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). A seminal paper by T. Barrett and R. Edgar, published in 2006 in the journal Methods in Molecular Biology, provides a comprehensive guide on mining microarray data at GEO. This blog post aims to highlight the significance of their work and explore how GEO has become an indispensable tool for researchers in the field of genomics.

**The Evolution of Microarray Technology and GEO**

Microarray technology allows for the simultaneous analysis of thousands of genes to determine their expression levels under specific conditions. This capability has opened new avenues for understanding disease mechanisms, drug responses, and developmental processes at the molecular level. However, the sheer volume of data generated by microarray experiments presented a significant challenge: how to store, manage, and share these data effectively. In response, NCBI developed GEO, a public repository designed to archive and make accessible microarray data.

**Barrett and Edgar’s Contributions**

The 2006 paper by Barrett and Edgar serves as a foundational guide for researchers looking to navigate and utilize GEO. The authors detailed the structure of the GEO database, how to deposit data into GEO, and, most importantly, how to mine the database for meaningful biological insights. They provided practical advice on using GEO’s tools for data retrieval, analysis, and interpretation. This guidance was crucial at a time when the use of microarray data was becoming increasingly widespread but the tools and methodologies for its analysis were still evolving.

**Impact on Genomics Research**

The impact of Barrett and Edgar’s work cannot be overstated. By making microarray data more accessible and providing a roadmap for its analysis, they facilitated a more collaborative and efficient approach to genomics research. Researchers can now build upon each other’s work, validate findings across multiple studies, and generate new hypotheses. GEO has become a cornerstone of genomic data analysis, with thousands of studies and millions of samples deposited to date.

**Current Relevance and Future Directions**

Today, GEO continues to be a vital resource for the scientific community. Advances in technology, including the development of next-generation sequencing and single-cell RNA sequencing, have expanded the types of data that can be analyzed. However, the principles outlined by Barrett and Edgar remain relevant, as the need for robust data management, sharing, and analysis tools persists. Future directions in genomics research will likely involve further integration of diverse data types, enhanced data mining capabilities, and more sophisticated analytical tools.

**Conclusion**

The publication by T. Barrett and R. Edgar in 2006 marked a significant milestone in the field of genomics, providing researchers with the knowledge to effectively utilize NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus. As the field continues to evolve, the foundational work laid by Barrett and Edgar serves as a reminder of the importance of data sharing, collaboration, and innovative analysis techniques in advancing our understanding of biology and disease. Their contributions have empowered researchers to explore new frontiers in genomics, leading to discoveries that are transforming science and medicine.

No Tags

97 total views, 1 today

  

Listing ID: N/A

Report problem

Processing your request, Please wait....

Sponsored Links

 

P. Dourish, “What We Talk about When We Talk about Context,” Personal and U...

P. Dourish, “What We Talk about When We Talk about Context,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2004, pp. 19-30. doi:10.1007/s00779-003-0253-8 “P. Dourish, […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

T. Strang and C. Linnhoff-Popien, “A Context Modeling Survey,” Workshop on ...

T. Strang and C. Linnhoff-Popien, “A Context Modeling Survey,” Workshop on Advanced Context Modelling, Reasoning and Management, UbiComp 2004—6th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Nottingham, […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

T. Strang, C. Linnhoff-Popien and K. Frank, “COOL: A Context Ontology Langu...

T. Strang, C. Linnhoff-Popien and K. Frank, “COOL: A Context Ontology Language to enable Contextual Inter-operability,” Proceedings of 4th IFIP WG 6.1 International Conference on […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

J. W. Kaltz, J. Ziegler and S. Lohmann, “Context-Aware Web Engineering: Mod...

J. W. Kaltz, J. Ziegler and S. Lohmann, “Context-Aware Web Engineering: Modeling and Applications,” RIA Re- vue d’Intelligence Artificielle, Special Issue on Applying Context Management, […]

No views yet

 

L. Gong, “Contextual Modeling and Applications,” IEEE International Confere...

L. Gong, “Contextual Modeling and Applications,” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cyber- netics, 2005, pp. 381-386. doi:10.1109/ICSMC.2005. 1571176 **L. Gong, “Contextual Modeling and […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

A. K. Dey, “Understanding and Using Context,” Personal and Ubiquitous Compu...

A. K. Dey, “Understanding and Using Context,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2001, pp. 4-7. doi:10.1007/s007790170019 None

1 total views, 1 today

 

H. Molina and L. Olsina, “Assessing Web Applications Consistently: A Contex...

H. Molina and L. Olsina, “Assessing Web Applications Consistently: A Context Information Approach Web En- gineering,” 2008 ICWE’08. Eighth International Confer- ence on Web Engineering, […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

B. A. Kitchenham, R. T. Hughes and S. G. Linkman, “Modeling Software Measur...

B. A. Kitchenham, R. T. Hughes and S. G. Linkman, “Modeling Software Measurement Data,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 9, 2001, pp. […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 14598-1: 1999—Information Technology—Software Product Eval...

ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 14598-1: 1999—Information Technology—Software Product Evaluation—Part 1: General Overview, 1999. None

1 total views, 1 today

 

CMMI Product Team, “CMMI for Development, Version 1.2,” Software Engineerin...

CMMI Product Team, “CMMI for Development, Version 1.2,” Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 15213, 2006. None

1 total views, 1 today

 

P. Dourish, “What We Talk about When We Talk about Context,” Personal and U...

P. Dourish, “What We Talk about When We Talk about Context,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2004, pp. 19-30. doi:10.1007/s00779-003-0253-8 “P. Dourish, […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

T. Strang and C. Linnhoff-Popien, “A Context Modeling Survey,” Workshop on ...

T. Strang and C. Linnhoff-Popien, “A Context Modeling Survey,” Workshop on Advanced Context Modelling, Reasoning and Management, UbiComp 2004—6th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Nottingham, […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

T. Strang, C. Linnhoff-Popien and K. Frank, “COOL: A Context Ontology Langu...

T. Strang, C. Linnhoff-Popien and K. Frank, “COOL: A Context Ontology Language to enable Contextual Inter-operability,” Proceedings of 4th IFIP WG 6.1 International Conference on […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

J. W. Kaltz, J. Ziegler and S. Lohmann, “Context-Aware Web Engineering: Mod...

J. W. Kaltz, J. Ziegler and S. Lohmann, “Context-Aware Web Engineering: Modeling and Applications,” RIA Re- vue d’Intelligence Artificielle, Special Issue on Applying Context Management, […]

No views yet

 

L. Gong, “Contextual Modeling and Applications,” IEEE International Confere...

L. Gong, “Contextual Modeling and Applications,” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cyber- netics, 2005, pp. 381-386. doi:10.1109/ICSMC.2005. 1571176 **L. Gong, “Contextual Modeling and […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

A. K. Dey, “Understanding and Using Context,” Personal and Ubiquitous Compu...

A. K. Dey, “Understanding and Using Context,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2001, pp. 4-7. doi:10.1007/s007790170019 None

1 total views, 1 today

 

H. Molina and L. Olsina, “Assessing Web Applications Consistently: A Contex...

H. Molina and L. Olsina, “Assessing Web Applications Consistently: A Context Information Approach Web En- gineering,” 2008 ICWE’08. Eighth International Confer- ence on Web Engineering, […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

B. A. Kitchenham, R. T. Hughes and S. G. Linkman, “Modeling Software Measur...

B. A. Kitchenham, R. T. Hughes and S. G. Linkman, “Modeling Software Measurement Data,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 9, 2001, pp. […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 14598-1: 1999—Information Technology—Software Product Eval...

ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 14598-1: 1999—Information Technology—Software Product Evaluation—Part 1: General Overview, 1999. None

1 total views, 1 today

 

CMMI Product Team, “CMMI for Development, Version 1.2,” Software Engineerin...

CMMI Product Team, “CMMI for Development, Version 1.2,” Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 15213, 2006. None

1 total views, 1 today