Welcome, visitor! [ Login

 

M. shao and C. L. Nikias. (1993) Signal Processing with fractional lower order moments: stable processes and their applications. Pro-ceedings of IEEE, Vol.81, No.7, 986-1010.

  • Listed: 10 May 2026 3 h 26 min

Description

M. shao and C. L. Nikias. (1993) Signal Processing with fractional lower order moments: stable processes and their applications. Pro-ceedings of IEEE, Vol.81, No.7, 986-1010.

**M. shao and C. L. Nikias. (1993) Signal Processing with fractional lower order moments: stable processes and their applications. Pro‑ceedings of IEEE, Vol.81, No.7, 986‑1010.**

When you scan the archives of the IEEE Xplore digital library, that long‑handed citation stands out as a milestone in the evolution of modern **signal processing**. Published in 1993, the paper by **M. Shao** and **C. L. Nikias** introduced a fresh mathematical toolbox—**fractional lower‑order moments (FLOM)**—that has since become indispensable for engineers dealing with **non‑Gaussian** and **heavy‑tailed** data. In this post we’ll unpack what makes the work so influential, explore the concept of **stable processes**, and highlight real‑world applications that still benefit from the authors’ pioneering insights.

### Why fractional lower‑order moments matter

Traditional signal analysis relies heavily on **second‑order statistics**—mean, variance, autocorrelation—because they are easy to compute and work perfectly for **Gaussian** signals. Yet many practical environments—radar clutter, underwater acoustics, financial time series, and biomedical recordings—exhibit impulsive bursts that dramatically violate Gaussian assumptions. In such cases, the variance may be infinite, rendering classic tools useless.

Shao and Nikias showed that by lowering the order of the moment (i.e., using an exponent **α** where 0 < α < 2) you can obtain **finite, robust measures** even when the underlying distribution has infinite variance. These **fractional lower‑order moments** capture the essence of a signal’s power without being overwhelmed by outliers, providing a more reliable descriptor for **stable processes**.

### Stable processes: the backbone of impulsive modeling

A **stable process** is a type of random process whose probability distribution remains stable under linear combinations—a property that generalizes the familiar Gaussian distribution. The most famous stable law is the **α‑stable distribution**, characterized by a stability index **α** (0 < α ≤ 2). When α = 2, the distribution collapses to the Gaussian case; when α < 2, the tails become “heavy,” meaning extreme values occur far more often.

Shao and Nikias demonstrated that FLOM analysis naturally aligns with the mathematical structure of **α‑stable** models. By computing moments of order **p < α**, they obtained meaningful statistics that directly relate to the underlying **characteristic function** of the process. This synergy unlocked new ways to estimate parameters, detect signals, and design filters in environments once thought too noisy to tame.

### From theory to practice: applications that thrive on FLOM

1. **Radar and sonar detection** – Impulsive sea clutter and atmospheric turbulence produce non‑Gaussian echoes. FLOM‑based detectors achieve higher **probability of detection (Pd)** while maintaining low **false alarm rates (FAR)**, especially in low‑signal‑to‑noise‑ratio (SNR) regimes.

2. **Communications security** – In spread‑spectrum and ultra‑wideband (UWB) systems, impulsive interference can cripple conventional receivers. Fractional‑order filters derived from the 1993 framework improve **interference mitigation** without sacrificing bandwidth efficiency.

3. **Biomedical signal analysis** – Electroencephalogram (EEG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings often contain sudden spikes caused by muscle artifacts or electrode motion. FLOM metrics help separate genuine physiological events from noise, enhancing **diagnostic accuracy** for epilepsy or arrhythmia detection.

4. **Financial engineering** – Asset returns display heavy tails and abrupt jumps. By modeling price dynamics with **α‑stable Lévy processes** and applying FLOM‑based risk measures, analysts obtain more realistic **Value‑at‑Risk (VaR)** estimates and better portfolio stress testing.

### Modern extensions and ongoing research

Nearly three decades after the original IEEE Proceedings, researchers continue to build on Shao and Nikias’ foundation. Recent works integrate **machine learning** with FLOM features, creating hybrid classifiers that excel in **anomaly detection** for IoT sensor networks. Others explore **fractional‑order Kalman filters** that fuse FLOM statistics with state‑space models, delivering robust tracking in autonomous vehicle navigation.

Moreover, the rise of **big data** has renewed interest in **computationally efficient** estimators for fractional moments. Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)‑based algorithms now compute FLOM‑based spectra in real time, opening doors for **edge‑computing** applications where power and latency constraints are critical.

### Bottom line: a timeless contribution

The 1993 paper “Signal Processing with fractional lower order moments: stable processes and their applications” remains a cornerstone reference for anyone tackling **impulsive, non‑Gaussian** data. Its blend of rigorous mathematics and practical insight paved the way for robust detection, estimation, and filtering techniques that are still relevant across radar, communications, biomedical engineering, and finance.

If you’re looking to strengthen your signal‑processing toolbox, start by mastering **fractional lower‑order moments** and the **stable‑process** framework. Not only will you honor the legacy of Shao and Nikias, you’ll also equip yourself with the analytical firepower needed to solve today’s most challenging noise‑dominated problems.

*Keywords: signal processing, fractional lower order moments, FLOM, stable processes, α‑stable distribution, IEEE Proceedings, non‑Gaussian noise, impulse detection, robust filtering, applications.*

No Tags

29 total views, 1 today

  

Listing ID: N/A

Report problem

Processing your request, Please wait....

Sponsored Links

 

Dai, L., Wang, J. and Rizos, C. (2001) The role of pseudosatellite signals ...

Dai, L., Wang, J. and Rizos, C. (2001) The role of pseudosatellite signals in precise GPS-based positioning. Journal of Geospatial Engineering, 3(1): 33-44. Okay, I […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Cramer, M., (2003) Integrated GPS/inertial and digital aerial triangulation...

Cramer, M., (2003) Integrated GPS/inertial and digital aerial triangulation: Recent test results. In: D. Fritsch (Editor), Photogrammetric Week ’03, Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 161?72. […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Coleman, T.F. (2006) Optimization Toolbox. The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA.

Coleman, T.F. (2006) Optimization Toolbox. The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA. **Coleman, T.F. (2006) Optimization Toolbox. The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA.** — When you see a […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Choi, I.K., Wang, J., Han, S. and Rizos, C. (2000) Pseudolites: a new tool ...

Choi, I.K., Wang, J., Han, S. and Rizos, C. (2000) Pseudolites: a new tool for surveyors? 2nd Trans Tasman Survey Congress, Queenstown, New Zealand, pp. […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

Bouska, C.T.J. and Raquet, J.F. (2003) Tropospheric Model Error Reduction i...

Bouska, C.T.J. and Raquet, J.F. (2003) Tropospheric Model Error Reduction in Pseudolite Based Positioning Systems. ION GPS/GNSS 2003, Portland OR, USA, pp. 390-298. “Bouska, C.T.J. […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Biberger, R.J., Teuber, A., Pany, T. and Hein, G.W. (2003) Development of a...

Biberger, R.J., Teuber, A., Pany, T. and Hein, G.W. (2003) Development of an APL Error Model for Precision Approaches and Validation by Flight Experiments. In: […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

Bernese (1999) Bernese GPS Software Manual, University of Bern.

Bernese (1999) Bernese GPS Software Manual, University of Bern. **Bernese (1999) Bernese GPS Software Manual, University of Bern.** *Unlocking the Power of Precise Positioning: A […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

Barltrop, K.J., Stafford, J.F. and Elrod, B.D. (1996) Local DGPS With Pseud...

Barltrop, K.J., Stafford, J.F. and Elrod, B.D. (1996) Local DGPS With Pseudolite Augmentation and Implementation Considerations for LAAS. In: ION (Editor), GPS, Kassas City MO. […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

Abdullah, Q.A., Hussain, M. and Munjy, R (2002) Airborne GPS-controlled Aer...

Abdullah, Q.A., Hussain, M. and Munjy, R (2002) Airborne GPS-controlled Aerial-triangulation: Theory and Pratical Concepts. ASPRS/ACSM 2002, Washington, DC. Okay, I need to write a […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Stansell, Jr., T. A. (1986) RTCM CS-104 Recommended Pseudolite Signal Speci...

Stansell, Jr., T. A. (1986) RTCM CS-104 Recommended Pseudolite Signal Specification. Global Positioning System, volume III. **Stansell, Jr., T. A. (1986) RTCM CS-104 Recommended Pseudolite […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Dai, L., Wang, J. and Rizos, C. (2001) The role of pseudosatellite signals ...

Dai, L., Wang, J. and Rizos, C. (2001) The role of pseudosatellite signals in precise GPS-based positioning. Journal of Geospatial Engineering, 3(1): 33-44. Okay, I […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Cramer, M., (2003) Integrated GPS/inertial and digital aerial triangulation...

Cramer, M., (2003) Integrated GPS/inertial and digital aerial triangulation: Recent test results. In: D. Fritsch (Editor), Photogrammetric Week ’03, Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 161?72. […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Coleman, T.F. (2006) Optimization Toolbox. The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA.

Coleman, T.F. (2006) Optimization Toolbox. The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA. **Coleman, T.F. (2006) Optimization Toolbox. The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA.** — When you see a […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Choi, I.K., Wang, J., Han, S. and Rizos, C. (2000) Pseudolites: a new tool ...

Choi, I.K., Wang, J., Han, S. and Rizos, C. (2000) Pseudolites: a new tool for surveyors? 2nd Trans Tasman Survey Congress, Queenstown, New Zealand, pp. […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

Bouska, C.T.J. and Raquet, J.F. (2003) Tropospheric Model Error Reduction i...

Bouska, C.T.J. and Raquet, J.F. (2003) Tropospheric Model Error Reduction in Pseudolite Based Positioning Systems. ION GPS/GNSS 2003, Portland OR, USA, pp. 390-298. “Bouska, C.T.J. […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Biberger, R.J., Teuber, A., Pany, T. and Hein, G.W. (2003) Development of a...

Biberger, R.J., Teuber, A., Pany, T. and Hein, G.W. (2003) Development of an APL Error Model for Precision Approaches and Validation by Flight Experiments. In: […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

Bernese (1999) Bernese GPS Software Manual, University of Bern.

Bernese (1999) Bernese GPS Software Manual, University of Bern. **Bernese (1999) Bernese GPS Software Manual, University of Bern.** *Unlocking the Power of Precise Positioning: A […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

Barltrop, K.J., Stafford, J.F. and Elrod, B.D. (1996) Local DGPS With Pseud...

Barltrop, K.J., Stafford, J.F. and Elrod, B.D. (1996) Local DGPS With Pseudolite Augmentation and Implementation Considerations for LAAS. In: ION (Editor), GPS, Kassas City MO. […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

Abdullah, Q.A., Hussain, M. and Munjy, R (2002) Airborne GPS-controlled Aer...

Abdullah, Q.A., Hussain, M. and Munjy, R (2002) Airborne GPS-controlled Aerial-triangulation: Theory and Pratical Concepts. ASPRS/ACSM 2002, Washington, DC. Okay, I need to write a […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Stansell, Jr., T. A. (1986) RTCM CS-104 Recommended Pseudolite Signal Speci...

Stansell, Jr., T. A. (1986) RTCM CS-104 Recommended Pseudolite Signal Specification. Global Positioning System, volume III. **Stansell, Jr., T. A. (1986) RTCM CS-104 Recommended Pseudolite […]

2 total views, 2 today