Welcome, visitor! [ Login

 

Listgarten, J., Damaraju, S., Poulin B., Cook, L., Dufour, J., Driga, A., Mackey, J., Wishart, D., Greiner,R., and Zanke, B., “Predictive Models for Breast Cancer Susceptibility from Multiple Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms”, Clinical Cancer Research (2004), Vol. 10, pp. 2725-2737.

  • Listed: 25 May 2026 16 h 15 min

Description

Listgarten, J., Damaraju, S., Poulin B., Cook, L., Dufour, J., Driga, A., Mackey, J., Wishart, D., Greiner,R., and Zanke, B., “Predictive Models for Breast Cancer Susceptibility from Multiple Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms”, Clinical Cancer Research (2004), Vol. 10, pp. 2725-2737.

**”Listgarten, J., Damaraju, S., Poulin B., Cook, L., Dufour, J., Driga, A., Mackey, J., Wishart, D., Greiner,R., and Zanke, B., “Predictive Models for Breast Cancer Susceptibility from Multiple Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms”, Clinical Cancer Research (2004), Vol. 10, pp. 2725-2737.”**

The quest for understanding the genetic underpinnings of breast cancer has been a longstanding challenge in the medical community. A pivotal study published in 2004 in the journal Clinical Cancer Research shed new light on this complex issue. The research, conducted by Listgarten et al., focused on developing predictive models for breast cancer susceptibility based on multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). This groundbreaking work has had a lasting impact on our comprehension of the genetic factors contributing to breast cancer.

**The Role of SNPs in Breast Cancer**

Single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, are variations in a single DNA building block, known as a nucleotide. These tiny changes can occur in the DNA of individuals and have been associated with various diseases, including breast cancer. The study by Listgarten et al. aimed to identify and evaluate the cumulative effect of multiple SNPs on breast cancer susceptibility. By analyzing a large dataset of SNPs, the researchers sought to create predictive models that could help identify individuals at higher risk of developing breast cancer.

**Methodology and Findings**

The researchers employed a robust approach, utilizing a combination of statistical and machine learning techniques to analyze the data. Their study involved assessing the association between multiple SNPs and breast cancer susceptibility in a large cohort of patients. The results revealed that a model incorporating multiple SNPs could accurately predict breast cancer susceptibility. Specifically, the study found that a polygenic model, which takes into account the cumulative effect of multiple genetic variants, outperformed traditional models that focused on a single genetic marker.

**Implications and Future Directions**

The findings of Listgarten et al. have significant implications for breast cancer research and clinical practice. The development of predictive models based on multiple SNPs can help identify individuals at high risk of developing breast cancer, enabling targeted screening and prevention strategies. Furthermore, this research highlights the importance of considering the cumulative effect of multiple genetic variants in understanding disease susceptibility. As our understanding of the genetic basis of breast cancer continues to evolve, studies like this one will play a crucial role in informing the development of personalized medicine approaches.

**Advancements in Breast Cancer Research**

The study by Listgarten et al. has contributed to the advancement of breast cancer research in several ways. Firstly, it has underscored the importance of incorporating genetic data into breast cancer risk assessment models. Secondly, it has demonstrated the potential of machine learning and statistical approaches in analyzing complex genetic data. Finally, it has paved the way for the development of more sophisticated predictive models that can integrate multiple genetic and environmental factors to provide a more accurate assessment of breast cancer risk.

In conclusion, the research by Listgarten et al. has made a significant contribution to our understanding of the genetic factors underlying breast cancer susceptibility. As we continue to unravel the complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors in breast cancer, studies like this one will remain essential in informing the development of effective prevention and treatment strategies. By exploring the relationship between multiple SNPs and breast cancer susceptibility, researchers can develop more accurate predictive models, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.

No Tags

6 total views, 3 today

  

Listing ID: N/A

Report problem

Processing your request, Please wait....

Sponsored Links

 

Y. P. Chen, A. L. Liestman, J. Liu, “Energy-efficient data aggregation hier...

Y. P. Chen, A. L. Liestman, J. Liu, “Energy-efficient data aggregation hierarchy for wireless sensor networks,” Proceedings of the 2nd Int’l Conf. on Quality of […]

No views yet

 

M. Ankit, M. Arpit, T. J. Deepak, R. Venkateswarlu and D. janakiram, “TinyL...

M. Ankit, M. Arpit, T. J. Deepak, R. Venkateswarlu and D. janakiram, “TinyLAP: A scalable learning automata- based energy aware routing protocol for sensor networks,” […]

No views yet

 

M. Esnaashari, M. R. Meybodi,” “A learning automata based data aggregation ...

M. Esnaashari, M. R. Meybodi,” “A learning automata based data aggregation method doe sensor networks,” CSICC, 2007. **”A learning automata based data aggregation method for […]

No views yet

 

P. Beyens, M. Peeters, K. Steenhaut, and A. Nowe, “Routing with compression...

P. Beyens, M. Peeters, K. Steenhaut, and A. Nowe, “Routing with compression in aireless sensor networks: A Q-learning approah,” AAMAS, 2005. None

No views yet

 

P. Radivojac, U. Korad, K. M. Sivalingam and Z. Obradovic, “Learning from c...

P. Radivojac, U. Korad, K. M. Sivalingam and Z. Obradovic, “Learning from class-imbalanced data in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE VTC, Fall 2003. None

No views yet

 

Y. P. Chen, A. L. Liestman and J. Liu, “A hierarchical energy-efficient fra...

Y. P. Chen, A. L. Liestman and J. Liu, “A hierarchical energy-efficient framework for data aggregation in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE, 2006. Okay, I need […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

S. Upadhyayula, V. Annamalai, and S. K. S. Gupta, “A lowlatency and energy-...

S. Upadhyayula, V. Annamalai, and S. K. S. Gupta, “A lowlatency and energy-efficient algorithm for convergecast,” EEE GLOBECOM, 2003. **S. Upadhyayula, V. Annamalai, and S. […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

Z. eskandari, M. H. Yaghmaee, A. H. Mohajerzade, “Automata based energy eff...

Z. eskandari, M. H. Yaghmaee, A. H. Mohajerzade, “Automata based energy efficient spanning tree for data aggregation in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE ICCS, 2008. None

3 total views, 3 today

 

S. Upadhyayula, V. Annamalai, and S. K. S. Gupta, “A low latency and energy...

S. Upadhyayula, V. Annamalai, and S. K. S. Gupta, “A low latency and energy-efficient algorithm for conver- gecast,” IEEE GLOBECOM, 2003. **S. Upadhyayula, V. Annamalai, […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

W. Zhang and G. Cao, “DCTC: Dynamic convoy tree- based collaboration for ta...

W. Zhang and G. Cao, “DCTC: Dynamic convoy tree- based collaboration for target tracking in sensor networks,” IEEE, 2004. Okay, I need to write a […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

Y. P. Chen, A. L. Liestman, J. Liu, “Energy-efficient data aggregation hier...

Y. P. Chen, A. L. Liestman, J. Liu, “Energy-efficient data aggregation hierarchy for wireless sensor networks,” Proceedings of the 2nd Int’l Conf. on Quality of […]

No views yet

 

M. Ankit, M. Arpit, T. J. Deepak, R. Venkateswarlu and D. janakiram, “TinyL...

M. Ankit, M. Arpit, T. J. Deepak, R. Venkateswarlu and D. janakiram, “TinyLAP: A scalable learning automata- based energy aware routing protocol for sensor networks,” […]

No views yet

 

M. Esnaashari, M. R. Meybodi,” “A learning automata based data aggregation ...

M. Esnaashari, M. R. Meybodi,” “A learning automata based data aggregation method doe sensor networks,” CSICC, 2007. **”A learning automata based data aggregation method for […]

No views yet

 

P. Beyens, M. Peeters, K. Steenhaut, and A. Nowe, “Routing with compression...

P. Beyens, M. Peeters, K. Steenhaut, and A. Nowe, “Routing with compression in aireless sensor networks: A Q-learning approah,” AAMAS, 2005. None

No views yet

 

P. Radivojac, U. Korad, K. M. Sivalingam and Z. Obradovic, “Learning from c...

P. Radivojac, U. Korad, K. M. Sivalingam and Z. Obradovic, “Learning from class-imbalanced data in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE VTC, Fall 2003. None

No views yet

 

Y. P. Chen, A. L. Liestman and J. Liu, “A hierarchical energy-efficient fra...

Y. P. Chen, A. L. Liestman and J. Liu, “A hierarchical energy-efficient framework for data aggregation in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE, 2006. Okay, I need […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

S. Upadhyayula, V. Annamalai, and S. K. S. Gupta, “A lowlatency and energy-...

S. Upadhyayula, V. Annamalai, and S. K. S. Gupta, “A lowlatency and energy-efficient algorithm for convergecast,” EEE GLOBECOM, 2003. **S. Upadhyayula, V. Annamalai, and S. […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

Z. eskandari, M. H. Yaghmaee, A. H. Mohajerzade, “Automata based energy eff...

Z. eskandari, M. H. Yaghmaee, A. H. Mohajerzade, “Automata based energy efficient spanning tree for data aggregation in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE ICCS, 2008. None

3 total views, 3 today

 

S. Upadhyayula, V. Annamalai, and S. K. S. Gupta, “A low latency and energy...

S. Upadhyayula, V. Annamalai, and S. K. S. Gupta, “A low latency and energy-efficient algorithm for conver- gecast,” IEEE GLOBECOM, 2003. **S. Upadhyayula, V. Annamalai, […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

W. Zhang and G. Cao, “DCTC: Dynamic convoy tree- based collaboration for ta...

W. Zhang and G. Cao, “DCTC: Dynamic convoy tree- based collaboration for target tracking in sensor networks,” IEEE, 2004. Okay, I need to write a […]

3 total views, 3 today