Welcome, visitor! [ Login

 

Chen G and Herring TA (1997): Effects Of Atmospheric Azimuthal Asymmerty On The Analysis Of Space Geodetic Data, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, No. B9, 20, 489–20,502, 1997.

  • Listed: 15 May 2026 19 h 34 min

Description

Chen G and Herring TA (1997): Effects Of Atmospheric Azimuthal Asymmerty On The Analysis Of Space Geodetic Data, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, No. B9, 20, 489–20,502, 1997.

**Chen G and Herring TA (1997): Effects Of Atmospheric Azimuthal Asymmerty On The Analysis Of Space Geodetic Data, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, No. B9, 20, 489–20,502, 1997.**

The Earth’s surface is constantly shifting—tectonic plates grind, mountains rise, and sea levels change. Modern scientists rely on **space geodesy** to capture these movements with millimeter‑level precision. Satellite‑based techniques such as GPS, VLBI, and SLR transmit radio signals through the atmosphere, and any distortion along that path can corrupt the final measurements. In their seminal 1997 paper, **Chen G and Herring TA** tackled one of the most subtle yet impactful sources of error: **atmospheric azimuthal asymmetry**.

### What is atmospheric azimuthal asymmetry?

Unlike a perfectly uniform atmosphere, the real Earth’s air mass varies with direction (azimuth). Temperature gradients, humidity pockets, and wind patterns create an uneven refractive index around the globe. When a satellite signal travels through this “lopsided” medium, its speed and direction are altered in a way that depends on the azimuthal angle of the signal’s path. This phenomenon is called **azimuthal asymmetry**, and it can introduce systematic biases into distance and angle calculations used in geodetic solutions.

### Why does it matter for space geodetic data?

Space geodesy hinges on the accurate determination of **baseline lengths**, **site coordinates**, and **Earth rotation parameters**. Even a few millimeters of error can cascade into misinterpretations of tectonic strain, sea‑level rise, or mantle convection. Chen and Herring demonstrated that ignoring azimuthal asymmetry can lead to:

* **Biases in GPS coordinate estimates** – especially for stations at high latitudes where atmospheric gradients are strongest.
* **Distorted VLBI delay measurements** – affecting the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF).
* **Inaccurate satellite laser ranging (SLR) residuals** – compromising Earth‑gravity field models.

Their analysis showed that incorporating an azimuth‑dependent atmospheric model reduced residuals by up to 30 %, a substantial improvement for high‑precision geodesy.

### How did the authors approach the problem?

The 1997 study combined **theoretical modeling** with **empirical data** from a global network of GPS and VLBI stations. By fitting a sinusoidal azimuthal term to the observed residuals, they quantified the magnitude of the asymmetry and proposed correction formulas that could be integrated into existing processing software. Their methodology emphasized:

1. **Separation of symmetric and asymmetric components** of the tropospheric delay.
2. **Statistical validation** using independent data sets to avoid over‑fitting.
3. **Practical implementation** guidelines for operational geodetic services.

### Legacy and modern relevance

Two decades later, the insights from Chen and Herring remain a cornerstone for **atmospheric modeling** in geodesy. Modern processing suites—such as **GIPSY‑OASIS**, **Bernese**, and **VieVS**—include azimuth‑dependent tropospheric corrections, directly tracing back to the 1997 findings. Moreover, the rise of **real‑time GNSS services** and **global climate monitoring** has renewed interest in refining atmospheric asymmetry models, linking geodesy with meteorology and climate science.

### Take‑away for researchers and practitioners

* **Account for azimuthal asymmetry** when high‑precision is required (e.g., crustal deformation studies, earthquake hazard assessment).
* **Use updated tropospheric mapping functions** that incorporate direction‑dependent terms.
* **Collaborate across disciplines**—atmospheric scientists can provide high‑resolution weather models that feed directly into geodetic processing pipelines.

By embracing the corrections championed by Chen and Herring, the geodetic community can continue to push the boundaries of Earth‑observing science, delivering ever‑more reliable data for navigation, climate research, and natural‑hazard mitigation.

**Keywords:** space geodesy, atmospheric azimuthal asymmetry, Chen and Herring 1997, tropospheric delay, GPS accuracy, VLBI residuals, satellite laser ranging, Earth rotation parameters, geodetic data analysis, atmospheric modeling, precision geodesy.

No Tags

22 total views, 9 today

  

Listing ID: N/A

Report problem

Processing your request, Please wait....

Sponsored Links

 

Rogers R. M. (2001) Large Azimuth INS Error Models for In-Motion Alignment ...

Rogers R. M. (2001) Large Azimuth INS Error Models for In-Motion Alignment Land-Vehicle Positioning, Proc. of the Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting 2001, pp. […]

No views yet

 

Nishiyama M., Fujioka S., Kubo Y., Sato T. and Sugimoto S. (2006) Performan...

Nishiyama M., Fujioka S., Kubo Y., Sato T. and Sugimoto S. (2006) Performance Studies of Nonlinear Filtering Methods in INS/GPS In-Motion Alignment, Proc. of the […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Misra P. and Enge P. (2001) Global Positioning System –Signals, Measu...

Misra P. and Enge P. (2001) Global Positioning System –Signals, Measurements, and Performance, Ganga-Jamuna Press, Massachusetts, 2001. **Misra P. and Enge P. (2001) Global Positioning […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Maybeck P. S. (1979) Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control (Mathematics...

Maybeck P. S. (1979) Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control (Mathematics in Science and Engineering), Academic Press, New York, 1979. Okay, I need to write a […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

Kitagawa G. (1996) Monte Carlo Filter and Smoother for Non-Gaussian Nonline...

Kitagawa G. (1996) Monte Carlo Filter and Smoother for Non-Gaussian Nonlinear State Space Models, Jounal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol. 5, pp. 1-25, 1996. […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

Julier S., Uhlmann J. and Durrant-Whyte H. F. (2000) A New Method for the N...

Julier S., Uhlmann J. and Durrant-Whyte H. F. (2000) A New Method for the Nonlinear Transformation of Means and Covariances in Filters and Estimators, IEEE […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Grewal M. S., Weill L. R. and Andrews A. P. (2001) Global Positioning Syste...

Grewal M. S., Weill L. R. and Andrews A. P. (2001) Global Positioning Systems, Inertial Navigation, and Integration, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001. […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

Gelb A. (1974) Applied Optimal Estimation, MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1974.

Gelb A. (1974) Applied Optimal Estimation, MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1974. **Gelb A. (1974) Applied Optimal Estimation, MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1974** — ### Unpacking a Classic […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

Fujioka S., Tanikawara M., Nishiyama M., Kubo Y. and Sugimoto S. (2005) Com...

Fujioka S., Tanikawara M., Nishiyama M., Kubo Y. and Sugimoto S. (2005) Comparison of Nonlinear Filtering Methods for INS/GPS In-Motion Alignment, Proc. of the Institute […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

Doucet A., Godsill J. and Andrieu C. (2000) On sequential Monte Carlo sampl...

Doucet A., Godsill J. and Andrieu C. (2000) On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering, Statistics and Computing, Vol. 3, pp. 197-208, 2000. […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Rogers R. M. (2001) Large Azimuth INS Error Models for In-Motion Alignment ...

Rogers R. M. (2001) Large Azimuth INS Error Models for In-Motion Alignment Land-Vehicle Positioning, Proc. of the Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting 2001, pp. […]

No views yet

 

Nishiyama M., Fujioka S., Kubo Y., Sato T. and Sugimoto S. (2006) Performan...

Nishiyama M., Fujioka S., Kubo Y., Sato T. and Sugimoto S. (2006) Performance Studies of Nonlinear Filtering Methods in INS/GPS In-Motion Alignment, Proc. of the […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Misra P. and Enge P. (2001) Global Positioning System –Signals, Measu...

Misra P. and Enge P. (2001) Global Positioning System –Signals, Measurements, and Performance, Ganga-Jamuna Press, Massachusetts, 2001. **Misra P. and Enge P. (2001) Global Positioning […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Maybeck P. S. (1979) Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control (Mathematics...

Maybeck P. S. (1979) Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control (Mathematics in Science and Engineering), Academic Press, New York, 1979. Okay, I need to write a […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

Kitagawa G. (1996) Monte Carlo Filter and Smoother for Non-Gaussian Nonline...

Kitagawa G. (1996) Monte Carlo Filter and Smoother for Non-Gaussian Nonlinear State Space Models, Jounal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol. 5, pp. 1-25, 1996. […]

1 total views, 1 today

 

Julier S., Uhlmann J. and Durrant-Whyte H. F. (2000) A New Method for the N...

Julier S., Uhlmann J. and Durrant-Whyte H. F. (2000) A New Method for the Nonlinear Transformation of Means and Covariances in Filters and Estimators, IEEE […]

2 total views, 2 today

 

Grewal M. S., Weill L. R. and Andrews A. P. (2001) Global Positioning Syste...

Grewal M. S., Weill L. R. and Andrews A. P. (2001) Global Positioning Systems, Inertial Navigation, and Integration, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001. […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

Gelb A. (1974) Applied Optimal Estimation, MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1974.

Gelb A. (1974) Applied Optimal Estimation, MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1974. **Gelb A. (1974) Applied Optimal Estimation, MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1974** — ### Unpacking a Classic […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

Fujioka S., Tanikawara M., Nishiyama M., Kubo Y. and Sugimoto S. (2005) Com...

Fujioka S., Tanikawara M., Nishiyama M., Kubo Y. and Sugimoto S. (2005) Comparison of Nonlinear Filtering Methods for INS/GPS In-Motion Alignment, Proc. of the Institute […]

3 total views, 3 today

 

Doucet A., Godsill J. and Andrieu C. (2000) On sequential Monte Carlo sampl...

Doucet A., Godsill J. and Andrieu C. (2000) On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering, Statistics and Computing, Vol. 3, pp. 197-208, 2000. […]

2 total views, 2 today