which of the following can developers not use open credential data for ?

Description

https://rozmoj.com › which-of-the-following-can-developers-not-use-open-credential-data-for

https://rozmoj.com › which-of-the-following-can-developers-not-use-open-credential-data-for
Which of the following can developers NOT use open credential data for …
Q2. Which of the following can developers NOT use open credential data for? A. Buying and selling NFTS. B. Creating loyalty campaigns. C. Calculating credit scores. D. Rewarding community contributors. Answer: (A) Buying and selling NFTS. Q3. What is NOT a possible use of the GAL token? A. Staking. B. Governance. C. Rewarding data contributors. D. Incentive payments

https://rozmoj.com › what-does-project-galaxy-think-should-control-credential-data

https://rozmoj.com › what-does-project-galaxy-think-should-control-credential-data
What does Project Galaxy think should control credential data? Coinbase …
Q2. Which of the following can developers NOT use open credential data for? A. Buying and selling NFTS. B. Creating loyalty campaigns. C. Calculating credit scores. D. Rewarding community contributors. Answer: (A) Buying and selling NFTS. Q3. What is NOT a possible use of the GAL token? A. Staking. B. Governance. C. Rewarding data contributors. D. Incentive payments

https://www.reddit.com › r › extracrypto › comments › w9tnvm › earn_free_3_project_galaxy_gal_coinbase_quiz

https://www.reddit.com › r › extracrypto › comments › w9tnvm › earn_free_3_project_galaxy_gal_coinbase_quiz
Earn Free $3 Project Galaxy | GAL Coinbase Quiz Answers
Question: Which of the following can developers NOT use open credential data for? Answer: Buying and selling NFTs Answer: Buying and selling NFTs Question: What is NOT a possible use of the GAL token?

https://www.doctorofcredit.com › coinbase-earn-learn-about-project-galaxy-earn-3-in-gal

https://www.doctorofcredit.com › coinbase-earn-learn-about-project-galaxy-earn-3-in-gal
Coinbase Earn – Learn About Project Galaxy, Earn $3 In GAL
The community Which of the following can developers NOT use open credential data for? Buying and selling NFTs What is NOT a possible use of the GAL token? Staking Our Verdict I always do these with the hopes of the coins being worth a lot in the future, but that usually doesn’t work out well (or at least hasn’t so far). Hat tip to reader Churnia

https://portalcripto.com.br › en › what-is-project-galaxy-coin-gal-token-web3-credential-data-network

https://portalcripto.com.br › en › what-is-project-galaxy-coin-gal-token-web3-credential-data-network
What is Project Galaxy coin (GAL) token, Web3 Credential Data Network …
Project Galaxy provides the infrastructure to help developers use credential data for their products, including Application Modules, Credential API, and Oracle Credential Engine. Use cases for App Modules include Galaxy OATs (On-chain Achievement Tokens), NFT loyalty programs, growth hacking campaigns, closed community, and custom governance. Developers can also leverage the Credential Oracle Engine and Credential API for enhanced custom use cases such as credit scoring and Sybil …

https://www.w3.org › TR › vc-data-model

https://www.w3.org › TR › vc-data-model
Verifiable Credentials Data Model v1.1 – W3
Verifiable credentials can be used to build verifiable presentations, which can also be cryptographically verified. The claims in a credential can be about different subjects. data minimization The act of limiting the amount of shared data strictly to the minimum necessary to successfully accomplish a task or goal. decentralized identifier

https://chercher.tech › agile-certification › scrum-master-certification-prep-questions-set-7

https://chercher.tech › agile-certification › scrum-master-certification-prep-questions-set-7
Scrum Master Certification Prep – Questions Set 7 – CherCherTech
Answer : Coach the Development Team to improve its skills, tools and infrastructure over time and establish a Definition of Done that is actually possible to achieve given the current circumstances. Agile Scrum Training, Scrum Master Certification Prep, Tests Set 1

https://quizlet.com › 515084142 › chapter-8-flash-cards

https://quizlet.com › 515084142 › chapter-8-flash-cards
Chapter 8 Flashcards | Quizlet
Identification. is the process of certifying the identity of a user who is requesting credentials. Permissions. use allow or Deny statements to control user access to resources. You want to increase security as users sign in to computers in the domain you administer. How can you implement the strongest form of multi-factor authentication …

https://quizlet.com › 373987168 › mis-chapter-5-flash-cards

https://quizlet.com › 373987168 › mis-chapter-5-flash-cards
MIS – Chapter 5 Flashcards | Quizlet
open source software. The motive for developing and improving _____ is not monetary, but rather the satisfaction of solving programming problems and the recognition of one’s contribution. open source software. The developers of _____ can obtain the source code free of charge, usually on the web. application-specific software.

https://chercher.tech › automation-anywhere-certification › automation-anywhere-rpa-professional-v11-certification-mocks-test-set-2

https://chercher.tech › automation-anywhere-certification › automation-anywhere-rpa-professional-v11-certification-mocks-test-set-2
(Automation Anywhere dumps) Automation Anywhere RPA … – CherCherTech
Options are : Use Control Room > Activity>Scheduled > Edit the Activity to change from a daily schedule to a weekly schedule and exclude Saturdays (Correct) Use Windows Task Scheduler to temporarily pause the activity on Saturdays. Use Control Room >Activity> In Progress to ‘auto-pause’ the task on Saturdays.

The holder of a verifiable credential sits at the center of a triangle of trust, mediating between issuer and verifier. The issuer and holder trust each other, the holder trusts the verifier, and the verifier trusts the issuer. Any role in the triangle can be played by a person, an institution, or an IoT device.
Verifiable credentials (VCs) are an open standard for digital credentials. They can represent information found in physical credentials, such as a passport or license, as well as new things that have no physical equivalent, such as ownership of a bank account. They have numerous advantages over physical credentials, most notably that they’re digitally signed, which makes them tamper-resistant and instantaneously verifiable.[1][2] The security of verifiable credentials has been questioned.[3][4] Verifiable credentials have also been subject to usability concerns.[5] Verifiable credentials can be issued by anyone, about anything, and can be presented to and verified by everyone. The entity that generates the credential is called the Issuer. The credential is then given to the Holder who stores it for later use. The Holder can then prove something about themselves by presenting their credentials to a Verifier.
Contents
1 Trust Model
2 Decentralization
3 Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0
3.1 Composition
3.2 Aliases
3.3 Subject
3.4 Proofs
4 Transport
5 See also
6 References
Trust Model[edit]
The holder of a verifiable credential sits at the center of a triangle of trust,[6] mediating between issuer and verifier.
The issuer trusts the holder
The holder trusts the verifier
The verifier trusts the issuer
Any role in the triangle can be played by a person, an institution, or an IoT device.
Note that because verifiable credentials can be created by anyone, the person or entity verifying the credential decides if they trust the entity that issued it. It is like a shop clerk deciding if they should accept an out-of-state license as proof of age when purchasing alcohol.
Decentralization[edit]
The VC model places the holder of a credential at the center of the identity ecosystem, giving individuals control of their identity attributes. The W3C VC model parallels physical credentials: the user holds cards and can present them to anyone at any time without informing or requiring the permission of the card issuer. Such a model is decentralized and gives much more autonomy and privacy to the participants. This contrasts with the federated identity management (FIM) model, as adopted by SAML and OpenID Connect, which place the identity provider (IdP) in the central role as the dispenser of identity attributes and the determiner of which Service Providers (SPs) it will give them to. In the federated model, the IdP knows every SP that the user visits.
Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0[edit]
The data model for verifiable credentials is a World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Recommendation, Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0 – Expressing verifiable information on the Web, published 19 November 2019.[7]
Composition[edit]
Verifiable Credentials may be expressed using JSON and is typically composed of:
Context
Issuer
Issue timestamp
Expiry timestamp
Type
Subject
Subject identity attributes
Cryptographic proof to ensure the integrity and authenticity of the VC
verifiableCredential:{
@context:[
https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1,
https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/examples/v1
],
id:0892f680-6aeb-11eb-9bcf-f10d8993fde7,
type:[
VerifiableCredential,
UniversityDegreeCredential
],
issuer:{
id:did:example:76e12ec712ebc6f1c221ebfeb1f,
name:Acme University
},
issuanceDate:2021-05-11T23:09:06.803Z,
credentialSubject:{
id:did:example:ebfeb1f712ebc6f1c276e12ec21,
degree:{
type:BachelorDegree,
name:Bachelor of Science
}
},
proof:{
type:Ed25519Signature2018,
created:2021-05-17T15:25:26Z,
jws:eyJhbGciOiJFZERTQYjY0Il19..nlcAA,
proofPurpose:assertionMethod,
verificationMethod:https://pathToIssuerPublicKey
}}
Aliases[edit]
The VC context, defined using the @context JSON property, is a JSON-LD construct that allows user friendly terms to be used for JSON properties. According to the VC data model, the value of many properties must be a URI. Whilst these are globally unambiguous, (important for a global data model), they are not user-friendly. Consequently, the @context property allows short-form, user-friendly aliases to be defined for each URI. This makes it much easier, and more user-friendly, to specify VCs. An example is given below.
{
@context: [
https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1,
https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/examples/v1
],
id: http://example.edu/credentials/3732,
type: [VerifiableCredential, UniversityDegreeCredential],
issuer: https://example.edu/issuers/14,
issuanceDate: 2010-01-01T19:23:24Z,
expirationDate: 2020-01-01T19:23:24Z,
credentialSubject: {
id: did:example:ebfeb1f712ebc6f1c276e12ec21,
degree: {
type: BachelorDegree,
name: Bachelor of Science and Arts
}
},
proof: {
}
}
W3C VCs are extensible. Any new property can be added to VCs, as determined by the issuer. Standard properties have been defined specifically as extension points. These include the following:
terms of use – restrictions placed on the use of the VC by the issuer
schema – defines VC contents
evidence – information collected by issuer about the subject and/or attributes before issuing the VC
status – pointers to where a verifier can discover the status of a VC (e.g., whether it has been revoked).
Subject[edit]
The holder of a VC does not always have to be the subject of the credential. It is expected that most users will hold their own VCs, i.e., the holder and the subject will be the same entity. This need not always be the case. For example, when the VC subject is an infant, and the VC is a birth certificate, the holder may be one or both parents.[8]
Proofs[edit]
No proof mechanism is standardized but the data model is flexible enough to support various existing cryptographic mechanisms, such as digital signatures. Proof mechanisms that are in use include: JSON Web Tokens with JSON Web Signatures, JSON-LD proofs, and zero-knowledge proofs using schemes such as IBM’s anonymous credentials.
Transport[edit]
Various protocols are specified for carrying VCs from the issuer/IdP to the holder, and the holder to the verifier. Examples include:
Aries RFC 0036: Issue Credential Protocol 1.0.,[9] and Aries RFC 0037: Present Proof Protocol 1.0[10]
David W Chadwick, Romain Laborde, Arnaud Oglaza, Remi Venant, Samer Wazan, Manreet Nijjar Improved Identity Management with Verifiable Credentials and FIDO, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine Vol 3, Issue 4, Dec 2019, Pages 14–20[11]
None of these protocols has become standardized. Many people who are experimenting with VCs use HTTPS to carry VCs between the various parties.
See also[edit]
Decentralized identifiers
References[edit]
^ An Introduction to Verifiable Credentials. verifiablecredential.io.
^ What are Verifiable Credentials? | Decentralized Identity Developer Docs. didproject.azurewebsites.net.
^ By embracing blockchain, a California bill takes the wrong step forward. blog.mozilla.org.
^ Vision: A Critique of Immunity Passports and W3C Decentralized Identifiers (PDF). arxiv.org.
^ DID and VC: Untangling Decentralized Identifiers and Verifiable Credentials for the Web of Trust. dl.acm.org.
^ A Gentle Introduction to Verifiable Credentials. www.evernym.com. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
^ Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0. www.w3.org. Retrieved 2019-11-05.
^ On Guardianship In Self-Sovereign Identity (PDF). www.sovrin.org. Retrieved 2021-11-05.
^ Khateev, Nikita. Aries RFC 0036: Issue Credential Protocol 1.0. Github – Hyperledger Aries Project. Hyperledger. Retrieved 5 November 2019.
^ Khateev, Nikita. Aries RFC 0037: Present Proof Protocol 1.0. Github – Hyperledger Aries Project. Hyperledger. Retrieved 5 November 2019.
^ Chadwick, David W.; Laborde, Romain; Oglaza, Arnaud; Venant, Remi; Wazan, Ahmad Samer; Nijjar, Manreet (2019-12-31). Improved Identity Management with Verifiable Credentials and FIDO. IEEE Communications Standards. 3 (4): 14–20. ISSN 2471-2825.