whose for non living things ?

Description

whose for non living things ?

Here are some links that might be useful to you:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/whose-used-for-inanimate-objects

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/whose-used-for-inanimate-objects
Using ‘Whose’ for Objects and Things | Merriam-Webster
English is a pretty impressive language, but sometimes it just doesn’t have the word you’re looking for. Writing handbooks will tell you that the relative pronoun that is used for animals, things, and sometimes collective or anonymous people (the book that won, infants that walk); which is used for animals and (the river which flows south); and who is used for people and for …

https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/86581/can-we-use-whose-for-things-or-should-i-use-that-or-which

https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/86581/can-we-use-whose-for-things-or-should-i-use-that-or-which
Can we use WHOSE for things? (or should I use ‘that’ or ‘which’?)
Can we use whose for abstract or non-living things? Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to … I have changed the net connection to a package whose cost is $15 per month. would be highly unusual. Generally speaking …

https://english.stackexchange.com / questions / 4786 / using-who-for-things-nonliving-beings

https://english.stackexchange.com / questions / 4786 / using-who-for-things-nonliving-beings
pronouns – Using who for things (nonliving beings) – English Language …
The word who only refers to living beings. For non-living beings, which is used instead. The word who’s is the contraction of either who is or who has, but either way, who’s first letter originates on the top row is incorrect because it contains two verbs. The relative pronoun whose can refer to non …

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/23541/can-whose-refer-to-an-inanimate-object

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/23541/can-whose-refer-to-an-inanimate-object
grammaticality – Can whose refer to an inanimate object? – English …
115. The word whose is used in several different grammatical ways. For some of these (see my original answer below), it has been grammatical to use it for inanimate objects, at least since the days of Shakespeare. For others (see my update), it is only used for people or animals. ORIGINAL ANSWER:

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/66457/can-whose-be-used-for-objects

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/66457/can-whose-be-used-for-objects
possessives – Can ‘whose’ be used for objects? – English Language …
7. There’s no problem with the usage you mention: whose can have both inanimate or animate referents (and there’s no such form which’s). Don’t get confused into thinking that whose is just some weird spelling of who’s: its meaning and syntax are different. As for a grammatical label, there’s no single proper grammatical label: it …

https://thewritepractice.com/whose-inanimate-objects

https://thewritepractice.com/whose-inanimate-objects
Can You Use Whose for Inanimate Objects? – The Write Practice
Whose for Inanimate Objects. Whose sounds most natural when it’s used for animate objects, like people and animals, and other things that breathe and possess the life force. Apparently there are folks out there who share the opinion that whose for inanimate objects shouldn’t be used because it sounds weird.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inanimate_whose

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inanimate_whose
Inanimate whose – Wikipedia
The inanimate whose appears in such works as the King James Version of the Bible: And they said; Goe to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven, and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. (Genesis 11:4)The inanimate whose refers to the use in English of the relative pronoun whose with -personal antecedents, as in …

https://www.grammar-monster.com/lessons/whose_with_inanimate_objects.htm

https://www.grammar-monster.com/lessons/whose_with_inanimate_objects.htm
Using ‘whose’ with inanimate objects – Grammar Monster
Do not treat whose like who (i.e., just for people). As we are programmed to identify animate antecedents when we encounter who, many people believe the relative pronoun whose must also refer to an animate antecedent. However, this is not the case. Whose can also be used for inanimate antecedents. (After all, the word which’s does …

https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/everyday-grammar-the-mysterious-word-whose-/4479936.html

https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/everyday-grammar-the-mysterious-word-whose-/4479936.html
The Mysterious Word ‘Whose’ – VOA Learning English
To ‘whose’ or not… For a long time, whose was used to show possession only by people or animals. Grammar tyrants balked at its use for non-living things. For example, they would not …

https://www.measuringknowhow.com/understanding-how-whose-can-be-used-for-things-a-guide

https://www.measuringknowhow.com/understanding-how-whose-can-be-used-for-things-a-guide
Understanding How ‘Whose’ Can Be Used for Things: A Guide
17 oct. 2023Using ‘whose’ for things with multiple owners or possessors. ‘Whose’ should only be used for singular possession or ownership. If a thing has multiple owners or possessors, use ‘of’ instead. For example, The car of my brother and sister is correct while The car whose owners are my brother and sister is incorrect.
lesoutrali bot