would you be willing to review a revision of this manuscript ?

Description

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13674935221083721

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13674935221083721
Would you be willing to review a revision of this manuscript?
26 févr. 2022As part of submitting your review you will be asked ‘Are you willing to review this manuscript again?’ After spending precious time providing a review it can be very tempting to decline this invitation. There could be numerous reasons for hitting No. However, I would like to make a plea for you to say YES.

https://www.euppublishing.com/early-career-researcher-hub/peer-review/reviewing-a-revision

https://www.euppublishing.com/early-career-researcher-hub/peer-review/reviewing-a-revision
Reviewing a revision – Edinburgh University Press
You’re not obliged to review a revision, but you will be the best placed person to check the updated manuscript, so editors are likely to contact you in the first instance. For the most part, you’ll find that reviewing a revision is very similar to reviewing an original submission.

https://master-academia.com / manuscript-revisions

https://master-academia.com / manuscript-revisions
How to revise a manuscript by responding to reviewer comments
Step 1: Take time to read and digest reviewer comments Step 2: Turn reviewer comments into actionable steps Step 3: Tackle one comment at a time Step 4: Resubmit your manuscript The importance and challenges of revising manuscripts Manuscripts are hardly ever accepted for publication without any .

https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/how-to-perform-a-peer-review/step-by-step-guide-to-reviewing-a-manuscript.html

https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/how-to-perform-a-peer-review/step-by-step-guide-to-reviewing-a-manuscript.html
Step by Step Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript | Wiley
Step by step guide to reviewing a manuscript When you receive an invitation to peer review, you should be sent a copy of the paper’s abstract to help you decide whether you wish to do the review. Try to respond to invitations promptly – it will prevent delays. It is also important at this stage to declare any potential Conflict of Interest.

https://plos.org/resource/youve-been-invited-to-review-now-what

https://plos.org/resource/youve-been-invited-to-review-now-what
You’ve Been Invited to Review. Now What? – PLOS
1. Am I the right person to review this manuscript? You should only review a manuscript if it matches your area of expertise. Even if the topic sounds fascinating, don’t agree to review if you do not have the expertise.

https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/how-to-perform-a-peer-review/reviewing-revised-manuscripts.html

https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/how-to-perform-a-peer-review/reviewing-revised-manuscripts.html
Reviewing Revised Manuscripts | Wiley
Reviewer Resources How to review revised manuscripts It is uncommon for a paper to be accepted for publication without changes – most papers are revised at least once in light of comments from reviewers and editors. When a revised paper is received: Minor changes will usually be assessed directly by the editor

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/13674935221083721

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/13674935221083721
Would you be willing to review a revision of this manuscript?
So, for you, our authors, our readers, our journal and for science, please say yes, that you are willing to review a manuscript again. Declaration of conflicting interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding

https://blog.mdpi.com/2022/12/13/review-manuscript

https://blog.mdpi.com/2022/12/13/review-manuscript
Reviewing Your Manuscript Q&A – MDPI Blog
6 nov. 2023Once you’ve submitted your manuscript, it will be pre-checked, and then sent for review. The reviewing stage is important to journal integrity. Your work will be read and rated by a few academics from your field. Based on their advice, your manuscript may be accepted, returned for minor or major corrections, or rejected.

https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/authorandreviewertutorials/submitting-to-a-journal-and-peer-review/revising-and-responding/10285584

https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/authorandreviewertutorials/submitting-to-a-journal-and-peer-review/revising-and-responding/10285584
Revising and responding | Springer — International Publisher
Once you manuscript has come back from reviewers you may be given the opportunity to revise it in accordance with the reviewer comments. You will usually receive a letter from the editor who handled your manuscript outlining the changes they would like you to make and links to the reviewer reports.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900210

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4900210
From the editor’s desk: A systematic guide to revising a manuscript
Abstract. Once a manuscript is submitted, the journal editor decides whether the manuscript merits further peer review, and the section editor or editor-in-chief reviews those comments and makes a decision that is conveyed to the corresponding author. Almost all accepted manuscripts require some kind. lesoutrali bot