who are the peers in peer review ?

Description

who are the peers in peer review ?

Here are some links that might be useful to you:

https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/peer-review

https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/peer-review
What Is Peer Review? | Types & Examples – Scribbr
Double-blind review. Triple-blind review. Collaborative review. Open review. Relatedly, peer assessment is a process where your peers provide you with feedback on something you’ve written, based on a set of criteria or benchmarks from an instructor. They then give constructive feedback, compliments, or guidance to help you improve your draft.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review
Peer review – Wikipedia
Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work ( peers ). [1] It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are used to maintain quality standards, improve performance, and provide credibility.

https://www.elsevier.com / reviewer / what-is-peer-review

https://www.elsevier.com / reviewer / what-is-peer-review
Reviewers | What is peer review? | Elsevier
Background. Reviewers play a pivotal role in scholarly publishing. The peer review system exists to validate academic work, helps to improve the quality of published research, and increases networking possibilities within research communities. Despite criticisms, peer review is still the only widely accepted method for research validation and …

https://plos.org/resource/how-to-write-a-peer-review

https://plos.org/resource/how-to-write-a-peer-review
How to Write a Peer Review – PLOS
Here’s how your outline might look: 1. Summary of the research and your overall impression. In your own words, summarize what the manuscript claims to report. This shows the editor how you interpreted the manuscript and will highlight any major differences in perspective between you and the other reviewers. Give an overview of the manuscript …

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594632

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9594632
Effective Peer Review: Who, Where, or What? – PMC
21 oct. 2022Peer review is widely viewed as one of the most critical elements in assuring the integrity of scientific literature (Baldwin, 2018; Smith, 2006).Despite the widespread acceptance and utilization of peer review, many difficulties with the process have been identified (Hames, 2014; Horrobin, 2001; Smith, 2006).One of the primary goals of the process is to identify flaws in the work …

https://publications.aap.org/hospitalpediatrics/article/12/11/e409/189689/Research-Methods-How-to-Perform-an-Effective-Peer

https://publications.aap.org/hospitalpediatrics/article/12/11/e409/189689/Research-Methods-How-to-Perform-an-Effective-Peer
Research Methods: How to Perform an Effective Peer Review
10 oct. 2022Peer review has been a part of scientific publications since 1665, when the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society became the first publication to formalize a system of expert review. 1,2 It became an institutionalized part of science in the latter half of the 20 th century and is now the standard in scientific research publications. 3 In 2012, there were more than 28 000 scholarly …

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjgh/2020/06/13/who-are-the-peers-in-peer-review-a-call-to-redefine

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjgh/2020/06/13/who-are-the-peers-in-peer-review-a-call-to-redefine
Who are the peers in peer-review? A call to redefine
In the current academic landscape, I submit that an ideal peer reviewer should have content and context expertise and be of equal scholarly status with the author that made the most significant contribution to the manuscript.The manuscript that inspired this blog post was eventually accepted in another elite journal following …

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944958

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944958
Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers – PMC
The peer review process is essential for evaluating the quality of scholarly works, suggesting corrections, and learning from other authors’ mistakes. The principles of peer review are largely based on professionalism, eloquence, and collegiate attitude. As such, reviewing journal submissions is a privilege and responsibility for ‘elite …

https://undsci.berkeley.edu/understanding-science-101/how-science-works/scrutinizing-science-peer-review

https://undsci.berkeley.edu/understanding-science-101/how-science-works/scrutinizing-science-peer-review
Scrutinizing science: Peer review – Understanding Science
Peer review typically works something like this: A group of scientists completes a study and writes it up in the form of an article. They submit it to a journal for publication. The journal’s editors send the article to several other scientists who work in the same field (i.e., the peers of peer review).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378379

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378379
A step-by-step guide to peer review: a template for patients and novice …
The peer review template for patients and novice reviewers (table 1) is a series of steps designed to create a workflow for the main components of peer review. A structured workflow can help a reviewer organise their thoughts and create space to engage in critical thinking. The template is a starting point for anyone new to , and it …
lesoutrali bot