do you think her opinion was justified explain ?

Description

https://openstax.org/books/introduction-philosophy/pages/7-3-justification

https://openstax.org/books/introduction-philosophy/pages/7-3-justification
7.3 Justification – Introduction to Philosophy | OpenStax
When we think we are justified in believing something, we think we have reason to believe it is true. How justification does this and how to think about the reasons will be discussed below. Second, justification does not always guarantee truth.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/anger-in-the-age-entitlement/202010/justify-or-not-justify

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/anger-in-the-age-entitlement/202010/justify-or-not-justify
To Justify or Not to Justify | Psychology Today
Justifying resentment is like justifying hunger; you never need to do it. Of course, some people seem compelled to justify their hunger. I’m really hungry; I didn’t have lunch.. Almost …

https://plato.stanford.edu / entries / reasons-just-vs-expl

https://plato.stanford.edu / entries / reasons-just-vs-expl
Reasons for Action: Justification, Motivation, Explanation
Most contemporary philosophers start by distinguishing two types of reason for action: normative reasons—that is, reasons which, very roughly, favour or justify an action, as judged by a well-informed, impartial observer; and motivating reasons—which, again roughly, are reasons the agent (that is, the person acting) takes …

https://www.enotes.com/topics/rules-game/questions/do-you-think-mother-justified-being-angry-meimei-580181

https://www.enotes.com/topics/rules-game/questions/do-you-think-mother-justified-being-angry-meimei-580181
Is the mother justified in her anger in Rules of the Game? Is Meimei …
Inuk Lee | Certified Educator Share Cite Rules of The Game – Amy Tan This is a great question. I think the mother has a right to be angry with her daughter. In order to make this point, we…

https://iep.utm.edu/epi-just

https://iep.utm.edu/epi-just
Justification, Epistemic | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Epistemic justification (from episteme, the Greek word for knowledge) is the right standing of a person’s beliefs with respect to knowledge, though there is some disagreement about what that means precisely. Some argue that right standing refers to whether the beliefs are more likely to be true.

https://human.libretexts.org/Courses/Los_Medanos_College/Phil_100:_Introduction_to_Philosophy_(Haven)/02:_Knowledge/2.02:_Justified_True_Belief

https://human.libretexts.org/Courses/Los_Medanos_College/Phil_100:_Introduction_to_Philosophy_(Haven)/02:_Knowledge/2.02:_Justified_True_Belief
2.2: Justified True Belief – Humanities LibreTexts
2.2: Justified True Belief. SOCRATES: Yes, my boy, and so do I; and my desire is to learn of him, or of anybody who seems to understand these things. And I get on pretty well in general; but there is a little difficulty which I want you and the company to aid me in investigating.

https://tinybuddha.com/blog/why-we-feel-the-need-to-explain-ourselves-and-justify-our-choices

https://tinybuddha.com/blog/why-we-feel-the-need-to-explain-ourselves-and-justify-our-choices
Why We Feel the Need to Explain Ourselves and Justify Our Choices
We offer (or don’t) an explanation of our choices for a variety of reasons. We can be motivated by fear, guilt, or self-doubt. We can also be honoring ourselves and others. There isn’t a straightforward answer to the question of how much to explain and when. While there may be some truth to the idea that we don’t owe anyone an explanation …

https://iep.utm.edu/gettier

https://iep.utm.edu/gettier
Gettier Problems | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Gettier Problems. Gettier problems or cases are named in honor of the American philosopher Edmund Gettier, who discovered them in 1963. They function as challenges to the philosophical tradition of defining knowledge of a proposition as justified true belief in that proposition. The problems are actual or possible situations in which someone …

https://open.library.okstate.edu/introphilosophy/chapter/how-can-punishment-be-justified-on-kants-retributivism

https://open.library.okstate.edu/introphilosophy/chapter/how-can-punishment-be-justified-on-kants-retributivism
How can punishment be justified? On Kant’s Retributivism
You, in contrast, spent weeks writing the perfect essay. It seems unjust if Derrick gets the same grade as you do—even if you get exactly the grade you deserve. In other words: you might object to Derrick being better off than he deserves in relation to the other people in the class. Kant’s view relies on much the same intuition.

https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/video/causing-harm

https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/video/causing-harm
Causing Harm – Ethics Unwrapped
Number one: The person harmed gave consent. Think of someone who agrees to go through a painful surgery so that he will be healthy again. That’s consent to cause harm. Number two: The harm caused was part of the harmer’s role-related responsibility. Sometimes causing justified harms is just part of the job. lesoutrali bot