can we use they for non living things ?

Description

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/how-to-use-theyre-there-their

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/how-to-use-theyre-there-their
How to Use They’re, There, and Their | Merriam-Webster
It can be used of non-living things too: They’re (=they are) both really good books. They’re (=they are) two of our biggest problems. Their Usage The last of this trio, their, is the possessive form of they, so it has to do with what belongs to, relates to, or is made or done by them. It’s their house. We’re their neighbors.

https://langeek.co/en/grammar/course/151/it-vs-they

https://langeek.co/en/grammar/course/151/it-vs-they
How to use It and They in English | LanGeek
Grammar grammar faq it vs. they impersonal pronouns it subject pronouns they ‘It’ and ‘they’ are both personal pronouns. If you want to know what are their uses and functions under different circumstances, don’t waste another second! What are their main differences? ‘ It ‘ and ‘ they ‘ are both personal pronouns in English.

https://www.usingenglish.com / forum / threads / it-or-they.182861

https://www.usingenglish.com / forum / threads / it-or-they.182861
It or They | UsingEnglish.com ESL Forum
#1 Please advise me on the correct usage. I am a bit confused about the use of it and they to refer to non living things. My understanding is that we use they to refer to more than one person and it to refer to one or more non living objects. Can I use they to refer to more than one one non living object?

https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/205039/using-their-or-its-when-referring-to-an-inanimate-object

https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/205039/using-their-or-its-when-referring-to-an-inanimate-object
Using their or its when referring to an inanimate object
The idea is that its or it refers to something in general or to some non-person, inanimate thing while their or they refers to people and even pets. Their and they can be used in the third-person singular. When used (instead of her or his) to refer to a person, their simply includes no information as to their gender:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/whose-used-for-inanimate-objects

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/whose-used-for-inanimate-objects
Using ‘Whose’ for Objects and Things | Merriam-Webster
It’s allowed, with one important exception What to Know Whose is the possessive form of the relative pronoun who. Which and that, the relative pronouns used for animals and objects, lack a possessive form, so whose can be used for their possessive forms as well, as in the movie, whose name I can’t remember.

https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/139519/they-only-for-living-things-and-people

https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/139519/they-only-for-living-things-and-people
pronouns – They only for living things and people? – English Language …
3 There’s absolutely nothing wrong with using ‘they’ for inanimate objects, ideas even. ‘Those radiators have been there a long time. They’ll get rusty.’ / His ideas aren’t cutting-edge – they’re crazy.’ // On the other hand, ‘They’re so many.’ sounds highfalutin, unidiomatic (or literary).

https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/73471/is-them-only-used-for-people

https://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/73471/is-them-only-used-for-people
pronouns – is them only used for people? – English Language Learners …
The only one of these that seems to have any traction at all is the use of they/them in the singular for this purpose, but this is still not considered acceptable in formal English (and formal style guides instead recommend constructions like he or she).

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/4786/using-who-for-things-nonliving-beings

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/4786/using-who-for-things-nonliving-beings
pronouns – Using who for things (nonliving beings) – English Language …
Well, no. The sentence which you quoted must be a typo of: We’re now going to move on to words whose first letter originates on the top row. for the following two reasons. The word who only refers to living beings. For non-living beings, which is used instead.

https://byjus.com/biology/living-and-non-living-things

https://byjus.com/biology/living-and-non-living-things
Living and Non living Things – Characteristics And Difference – BYJU’S
Introduction We can find many things around us, from mountains and oceans to plants and animals. The earth in which we live is made up of several things. These things can be categorized into two different types – Living and Non-living Things. All living things breathe, eat, grow, move, reproduce and have senses.

https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/non-living-thing

https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/non-living-thing
Non-living thing – Definition and Examples – Biology Online
Definition: An inanimate thing or object Table of Contents Non-living Thing Definition A non-living thing in biology means any form without a life, such as an inanimate body or object. Compared with the entity that has a life, a non-living thing lacks the features that characterize a living thing. lesoutrali bot