would you consider the use of ddt to be positive or negative ?

Description

would you consider the use of ddt to be positive or negative ?

Here are some links that might be useful to you:

https://www.ablison.com/pros-and-cons-of-ddt

https://www.ablison.com/pros-and-cons-of-ddt
Pros and Cons of DDT | Ablison
24 mars 2024As shown in the table, the use of DDT resulted in a drastic decrease in the incidence and mortality rates of malaria and typhus. Public health conditions also improved significantly. However, it is important to consider the potential negative impacts of DDT, which will be discussed in the following sections. Potential Health Risks?

https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/ddt-brief-history-and-status

https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/ddt-brief-history-and-status
DDT – A Brief History and Status | US EPA
12 mars 2024DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) was developed as the first of the modern synthetic insecticides in the 1940s. It was initially used with great effect to combat malaria, typhus, and the other insect-borne human diseases among both military and civilian populations. It also was effective for insect control in crop and livestock production …

https://www.britannica.com / science / DDT

https://www.britannica.com / science / DDT
DDT | Description, History, Effects, Uses, Banned, & Facts
11 mai 2024Use of DDT began to be restricted in the 1960s, thanks in part to the public awareness raised by Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring (1962). DDT was banned outright in the 1970s in many countries. The chemical is still used in some places, particularly as an indoor pesticide for mosquitoes in areas where malaria remains a major public health concern.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/consequences-of-ddt-exposure-could-last-generations

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/consequences-of-ddt-exposure-could-last-generations
Consequences of DDT Exposure Could Last Generations
The pesticide DDT, widely dispersed in the U.S. in the mid-20th century, was banned in 1972. … If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing …

https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/pdf/10.1289/ehp.trp010110

https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/pdf/10.1289/ehp.trp010110
DDT: The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown, with Brenda
DDT is a cheap, effective weapon against the spread of this disease, which infects nearly 250 million people each year and kills nearly 1 million. However, little is known about the long-term human health effects of exposure to DDT in the context of indoor spraying. In this podcast, Brenda Eskenazi describes research issues surrounding the …

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT
DDT – Wikipedia
For example, DDT use is widespread in Indian agriculture, particularly mango … cost, and collateral effects – both positive and negative – to human health and the environment, as well as the uncertainties associated with all these considerations? Hans … but would also consider ecological damage and human health impacts. …

https://www.acsh.org/news/2005/11/19/risks-and-benefits-of-ddt

https://www.acsh.org/news/2005/11/19/risks-and-benefits-of-ddt
Risks and Benefits of DDT – American Council on Science and Health
Bis(4-chlorophenyl)-1,1,2-trichloroethane (DDT) has been shown, over the past sixty years, to be one of the few affordable and effective tools against malarial vector mosquitoes, which account for over 300 million cases of disease and more than 1 million deaths every year. However, the Review by Walter Rogan and Aimin Chen (Aug. 27, p. 763), which aims to balance the risks and benefits of …

https://web.stanford.edu/group/sjph/cgi-bin/sjphsite/shoot-to-kill-control-and-controversy-in-the-history-of-ddt-science

https://web.stanford.edu/group/sjph/cgi-bin/sjphsite/shoot-to-kill-control-and-controversy-in-the-history-of-ddt-science
Shoot to Kill: Control and Controversy in the History of DDT Science
The degree to which DDT helped significantly reduce the malaria burden is the subject of ongoing debate, but it is still deployed around the world as a valuable disease-fighting tool. 32 DDT has undeniably devastating environmental and health ef- fects, and for years efforts to curb the use of DDT often downplayed or outright ignored its …

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/68616/WHO_HTM_RBM_2004.54.pdf?sequence=1

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/68616/WHO_HTM_RBM_2004.54.pdf?sequence=1
PDF Frequently asked questions on DDT use for disease vector control
Yes, DDT may be used for the control of the mosquito vectors of malaria. DDT use for malaria vector control is, however, strictly governed by the protocols of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) and the specific recommendations of WHO. The Stockholm Convention allows production and for public health purposes …

https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.11748

https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.11748
The Pine River Statement: Human Health Consequences of DDT Use
The use of DDT historically may have helped prevent millions of infections and deaths from insect-borne diseases. Based on recent studies, we conclude that humans are exposed to DDT and DDE, that indoor residual spraying can result in substantial exposure, and that DDT may pose a risk for human populations.
lesoutrali bot